LIVE FORUMS / ARCHIVES / 2009
PolishForums - ARCHIVE Witamy in PolishForums Archive :
Archives / 2009 / History of Poland / posts: 61

A few thoughts after plowing through most "Sabaton: 40-1" comments on YouTube


page 2 of 3:  « Prev  1  2  3  Next »

Pan KazimierzThreads: 2
Posts: 276
Joined: Jul 4, 09
  Jul 28, 09, 13:46 /  #
Bratwurst Boy:
Well...they will always serve as a prime example that a country needs more than a "grande army" with good equipment to be an effective force.
The french had all that but look what happened...

Yes, that's true, and I'm not saying that the Germans were really cowards and wimps behind their superior equipment and numbers. Morale and training are also extremely important factors. But they weren't exactly an unstoppable uber-army, either.

Bratwurst Boy:
They had the Nazi gold in their banks? I'm only guessing here...

Good guess, but no. Probably more to do with the Swiss Militia program. The one that requires, by law, all adult male citizens to keep government-provided rifles and ammunition in their homes, and to attend mandatory shooting practices on a regular basis.
It's gotten even better nowadays: now they all get assault rifles.
On a gun-control note, rate of firearm crimes in Switzerland is relatively quite low.

Torq:
Allies, BB, we are allies. I wouldn't go as far as saying "friends".

Closer than with Russia, I would say.

Bratwurst Boy:
Well...maybe I could acknowledge more the achievements of the polish army when you could acknowledge that the german army did actually sometimes fight against enemy military during breaks slaughtering civilians.

I acknowledge that it was indeed a semi-common occurance. Do I get a prize? :)

TorqThreads: 65
Posts: 4,024
Joined: Apr 10, 09
 Gold Member MEMBER  Pictures: 1
Edited by: Torq   Jul 28, 09, 13:50 /  #
Pan Kazimierz:
Closer than with Russia, I would say.

Well, of course. With Russia we are neither allies nor friends.

Pan Kazimierz:
On a gun-control note, rate of firearm crimes in Switzerland is relatively quite low.

Good point. When will people finally understand that gun-control is only in the
interest of criminals, who will always acquire weapons when needed, and against
the interest of common people?
Bratwurst BoyThreads: 11
Posts: 14,563
Joined: Apr 2, 07
  Jul 28, 09, 14:03 /  #
Torq:
You've been to this forum for long enough to know the rules of engagement against
me :) Everytime you try to diminish the bravery of Polish soldiers or try to ridicule our
war effort etc. etc. I will remind you about the inhuman atrocities that your army
comitted. Such are the rules, sorry - ordnung muss sein :)

Do I smell another treaty here??? :)
TorqThreads: 65
Posts: 4,024
Joined: Apr 10, 09
 Gold Member MEMBER  Pictures: 1
  Jul 28, 09, 14:06 /  #
Bratwurst Boy:
Do I smell another treaty here??? :)

A simple gentlemen's agreement would suffice, I think :)
Pan KazimierzThreads: 2
Posts: 276
Joined: Jul 4, 09
Edited by: Pan Kazimierz   Jul 28, 09, 14:06 /  #
Torq:
Good point. When will people finally understand that gun-control is only in the
interest of criminals, who will always acquire weapons when needed, and against
the interest of common people.

You know, I do believe there are certain people in the world who are just not capable of wrapping their minds around the concept. I've brought up the Switzerland Card before, only to observe some stroke-like symptoms of confusion and babbling followed by the exclamation that this is of course logical, since one can't exactly inconspicuously conceal an assault rifle in a public place. In which case, fine, outlaw handguns and let people buy assault rifles, instead. :D
I've personally been wanting to get hold of a Mini-Beryl for the props...
TorqThreads: 65
Posts: 4,024
Joined: Apr 10, 09
 Gold Member MEMBER  Pictures: 1
  Jul 28, 09, 14:11 /  #
Pan Kazimierz:
You know, I do believe there are certain people in the world
who are just not capable of wrapping their minds around the concept.

Tell me about it! I've given up trying to convince people not to support gun-control
long time ago. It's kinda like with differential equations for example - some people
have enough brains to understand it, some don't. Too bad that people who don't,
happen to be the ruling "elites" of this country (I mean the gun-control issue, not
differential equations ;)).
MatyjaszThreads: 2
Posts: 1,786
Joined: Jul 20, 06
  Jul 28, 09, 14:21 /  #
Bratwurst Boy:
It's even more amusing trying to make the Poland campaign somehow to something else than a devastating, humiliating defeat for the "in one week in Berlin" types of "proud" Poles. :):):)

That was propaganda, duuhhh... What else where they suppose to say. "We will be overrun in about four weeks and as a outcome most probably 3 million of us will die!" ??? :)

Torq:
If Czechs didn't surrender like cowards in 1938 but decided to ally themselves
with Poland instead, it would result in Germany not being able to encircle Polish
armies from the South and add some Czech troops to our forces (having very
good weapons, mainly tanks). The only problem would be to convince those
Czech divisions to actually fight *rolls eyes*

Hold your horses there mate! The problem wouldn't have been to convince the Czechs to fight, but rather to come to an agreement over Zaolzie and start cooperating. Both sides failed to do so and as a result we were overrun by helmuts. Simple. The Czechs were alone mate, they didn't have many options.
HarryThreads: 62
Posts: 8,508
Joined: May 2, 07
[Suspended]
  Jul 28, 09, 16:21 /  #
equinox:
303 Squadron (most enemy kills during Battle of Britain)

Try learning about history instead of myth.


Torq:
If Czechs didn't surrender like cowards in 1938 but decided to ally themselves
with Poland instead,

Don't you mean 'If Poland hadn't allied itself with Hitler and joined the invasion of Czechoslovakia'....


Torq:
The only problem would be to convince those Czech divisions to actually fight

Given that your army was one of the ones invading Czechoslovakia, it's probably quite fortunate for Poland that the Czechs didn't fight, eh?
TorqThreads: 65
Posts: 4,024
Joined: Apr 10, 09
 Gold Member MEMBER  Pictures: 1
  Jul 28, 09, 16:42 /  #
Harry:
joined the invasion of Czechoslovakia'

Your ignorance, when it comes to history, never ceases to amaze me.

Our army only took back what the Czechs stole from us, backstabbing us
when we were busy fighting the red hordes in the Polish-Soviet war.

Don't you mean 'If Poland hadn't allied itself with Hitler

At no point in history Poland was an ally to Hitler. Such lies only make
you look ridiculous.
HarryThreads: 62
Posts: 8,508
Joined: May 2, 07
[Suspended]
  Jul 28, 09, 17:00 /  #
Torq:
Our army only took back what the Czechs stole from us, backstabbing us
when we were busy fighting the red hordes in the Polish-Soviet war.

Any excuse, eh? Perhaps Poland shouldn't have committed at the Spa conference to the borders agreed there? And I do love how you claim the entire Zaolzie region based on the fact that in 1921 there were 68,034 Poles there and 88,556 Czechs!


Torq:
At no point in history Poland was an ally to Hitler. Such lies only make
you look ridiculous.

Do you deny that Poland took part in Hitler's dismemberment of Czechoslovakia? If you were not Hitler's ally in that invasion, you were at least his accomplice.


Torq:
Your ignorance, when it comes to history, never ceases to amaze me.

Your outstanding ability to lie about the darker points of Polish history should probably amaze me but no longer does.
TorqThreads: 65
Posts: 4,024
Joined: Apr 10, 09
 Gold Member MEMBER  Pictures: 1
Edited by: Torq   Jul 28, 09, 17:10 /  #
Harry:
Your outstanding ability to lie about the darker points of Polish history

Show me any lie that I made about Polish history. Just one will do.

I can show you one of yours in this very thread - you said that Poland allied itself
to Hitler - that's an obvious lie. Now your turn.

As for the Polish-Czech conflict over Zaolzie:

Wikipedia:
The Polish side based its claim to the area on ethnic criteria: a majority of the area's
population was Polish according to the last (1910) Austrian census.


The new Czechoslovakia claimed the area partly on historic and ethnic grounds, but
especially on economic grounds. The area was important for the Czechs as the
crucial railway line connecting Czech Silesia with Slovakia crossed the area.

On 5 November 1918, the area was divided between Poland and Czechoslovakia by an interim agreement of two local self-government councils (Czech Národní výbor pro Slezsko and Polish Rada Narodowa Księstwa Cieszyńskiego). Before that, the majority of the area was taken over by Polish local authorities. In 1919 both councils were absorbed by the newly created and independent central governments in Prague and Warsaw. The former was not satisfied with this compromise and on 23 January 1919 invaded the area.

The reason for the Czech invasion in 1919 was primarily the organisation of elections to the Sejm (parliament) of Poland in the disputed area.The elections were to be held in the whole of Cieszyn Silesia. The Czechs claimed that the polls must not be held in the disputed area as the delimitation was only interim and no sovereign rule should be executed there by any party. When the Czech demand was rejected by the Poles, the Czechs decided to resolve the issue by force.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaolzie
HarryThreads: 62
Posts: 8,508
Joined: May 2, 07
[Suspended]
  Jul 28, 09, 17:24 /  #
Torq:
I can show you one of yours in this very thread - you said that Poland allied itself to Hitler - that's an obvious lie. Now your turn.

Please point out how taking part in the Nazi dismemberment of Czechoslovakia is not allying oneself with Hitler.


Torq:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaolzie

Let's use your own source against you:
Nevertheless, the Polish leader, Colonel Józef Beck believed that Warsaw should act rapidly to forestall the German occupation of the city. At noon on 30 September, Poland gave an ultimatum to the Czechoslovak government. It demanded the immediate evacuation of Czech troops and police and gave Prague time until noon the following day. At 11:45 a.m. on 1 October the Czech foreign ministry called the Polish ambassador in Prague and told him that Poland could have what it wanted. The Germans were delighted with this outcome. They were happy to give up a provincial rail centre to Poland; it was a small sacrifice indeed. It spread the blame of the partition of Czechoslovakia, made Poland a seeming accomplice in the process and confused the issue as well as political expectations. Poland was accused of being an accomplice of Nazi Germany – a charge that Warsaw was hard put to deny.

Would you now like to claim that being an accomplice of Hitler is so very different to being an ally of Hitler?
Filios1Threads: 15
Posts: 1,953
Joined: Nov 13, 07
Edited by: Filios1   Jul 28, 09, 17:32 /  #
Harry:
They were happy to give up a provincial rail centre to Poland

This land had always been Polish, with a large Polish population living there. We were taking back what had been rudely taken away by the Czechs decades earlier. Frankly, those Czechs living there were probably happy the Poles took over administration, rather than Nazis.
Aren't you sick and tired of being a polonophobe, rabbi Harry?
TorqThreads: 65
Posts: 4,024
Joined: Apr 10, 09
 Gold Member MEMBER  Pictures: 1
Edited by: Torq   Jul 28, 09, 17:37 /  #
to forestall the German occupation of the city

Please point out how doing something to forestall the German occupation
is allying oneself to Germany.

Harry:
Would you now like to claim that being an accomplice of Hitler is so very different to being an ally of Hitler?

Even the word "accomplice" is highly debatable in this context and it IS very different
to being an ally of Hitler, because being an ally means to have an alliance and there
was never any kind of alliance between Poland and Third Reich.

Poland didn't help Hitler to invade Czechoslovakia. He would do it anyway and wouldn't
need any help. We only tried to forestall the German occupation and save at least a part
of Polish population of the region from the horrors of Nazi occupation (taking back what
was rightfully ours in the process).
HarryThreads: 62
Posts: 8,508
Joined: May 2, 07
[Suspended]
Edited by: Harry   Jul 29, 09, 13:31 /  #
Torq:
Even the word "accomplice" is highly debatable in this context

So now you disagree with the source which you yourself posted, how surprising.


Torq:
because being an ally means to have an alliance and there was never any kind of alliance between Poland and Third Reich.

I see, so both Poland and Germany independently decided to invade parts of Czechoslovakia. OK, that's entirely plausible!


Torq:
Poland didn't help Hitler to invade Czechoslovakia.

So you just invaded bits of it and Germany invaded other bits of it. You didn't help him at all!


Torq:
He would do it anyway and wouldn't need any help.

Oh look, the Jedwabne defence! Guess what: saying 'if we hadn't invaded it, Hitler would have invaded it' is as valid an excuse as saying 'if we hadn't murdered those Jews, the Germans would have sent them to a death camp'!


Torq:
taking back what was rightfully ours in the process

It was not rightfully yours. Poland agreed at the Spa conference that the area in question belonged to Czechoslovakia. Then Poland invaded it in 1938 when the Czechs were unable to defend it. A classic backstab from the country which gave the world the Peace of Riga backstab, an all-time classic amongst backstabs!
Pan KazimierzThreads: 2
Posts: 276
Joined: Jul 4, 09
Edited by: Pan Kazimierz   Jul 30, 09, 10:22 /  #
Harry:
It was not rightfully yours. Poland agreed at the Spa conference that the area in question belonged to Czechoslovakia.

In exactly the same way that Poland invaded it in 1938, the Czechs were unable to defend it, and the Czechs agreed that it was Polish. Czechs invaded it prior, and the Polish were unable to defend it.

Pan Kazimierz:
So now you disagree with the source which you yourself posted, how surprising.

That is not correct. Take a closer look at the wording of the quote you posted.
TorqThreads: 65
Posts: 4,024
Joined: Apr 10, 09
 Gold Member MEMBER  Pictures: 1
Edited by: Torq   Jul 30, 09, 10:37 /  #
Filios1:
Frankly, those Czechs living there were probably happy the Poles took over administration, rather than Nazis.

Good point.

to forestall the German occupation of the city

Torq:
Please point out how doing something to forestall the German occupation
is allying oneself to Germany.

?

Harry:

You said that Poland "allied itself to Germany" which is a lie and pure idiocy.
Your comparing of forestalling the German occupation of Zaolzie by Poland
and the murder of Jews in Jedwabne doesn't even merit any kind of reply.

Frankly, judging by your previous posts on this forum, you're just an angry man
with a huge chip on your shoulder, but that's your problem. I have no time for
muppets like you.

Why don't you and RevokeNice start your own forum - ihatepoland.com
and talk to yourselves? Have fun.
HarryThreads: 62
Posts: 8,508
Joined: May 2, 07
[Suspended]
  Jul 30, 09, 13:23 /  #
Pan Kazimierz:
In exactly the same way that Poland invaded it in 1938, the Czechs were unable to defend it, and the Czechs agreed that it was Polish. Czechs invaded it prior, and the Polish were unable to defend it.

That would be a good argument if Poland had limited itself to taking only the parts of the region which had been Polish from 1918 to 1920. But Poland didn't limit itself to taking only those parts, they took more. In fact they even took territory which had never been part of Cieszyn!


Torq:
Frankly, judging by your previous posts on this forum, you're just an angry man with a huge chip on your shoulder, but that's your problem. I have no time for
muppets like you.

So what you mean is that you are unable to attack the argument so you have to attack the poster. Yawn.
lesserThreads: 7
Posts: 2,014
Joined: Oct 19, 07
  Jul 30, 09, 21:52 /  #
Harry:
That would be a good argument if Poland had limited itself to taking only the parts of the region which had been Polish from 1918 to 1920. But Poland didn't limit itself to taking only those parts, they took more. In fact they even took territory which had never been part of Cieszyn!

A pity that Poland did not took whole Czechoslovakia. I understand that Nazis are disappointed that cute Adi failed to grab these lands from the start.
Pan KazimierzThreads: 2
Posts: 276
Joined: Jul 4, 09
  Aug 3, 09, 13:13 /  #
Anyway, back to Sabaton- just found out through the weirdest set of coincidences that they're going to be touring in Poland. Schedule:

Mon. 31st Aug. - Warsaw
Tue. 1st Sept. - Bydgoszcz
Wed. 2nd Sept. - Zielona Gora
Fri. 4th Sept. - Siemianowice Slaskie
Sat. 5th Sept. - Rzeszow
Sun. 6th Sept. - Gora Strekowa

Had to do with my being forced to walk home from a relative's one night, but for which I would never have noticed the poster (I live in Rzeszów), as I generally pay absolutely no attention to those things. Anyway, not sure that I'll attend, but the thought has crossed my mind. Anyone else thinking of going to see them live?
gumishuThreads: 17
Posts: 3,943
Joined: Apr 6, 09
 Pictures: 1
  Aug 3, 09, 16:34 /  #
Bratwurst Boy
Bratwurst Boy:
What's the fuss about?

I read about this but couldn't detect anything special (besides Germans dropping leaflets to give the Poles a chance to surrender).

Germans attack - Poles defend a fort - Poles get overrun - Poles kill themselves - Germans march on - Poland done 3 weeks later

So what?

But hey...maybe you should put it in your holy lists of battles against Germans...like...um....say ...Grunwald...:)

PS: Sabatons lyrics are quite funny when you think about it:
"So come, bring on all that you've got/Come hell, come high water, Never stop/Unless you are 40 to 1/Your lives will soon be undone"
If I were a Pole I would rather not try it again...
The last times Poles bragged about a war with Germany they did not look so good later!

Polish defenders only surrendered (cpt Raginis took his life on that occasion) when the commander was blackmailed that unless they surrender Polish prisoners of war taken in the battle would be executed
Mr GrunwaldThreads: 34
Posts: 2,358
Joined: Dec 16, 08
  Aug 6, 09, 20:36 /  #
Bratwurst Boy:
Oh puuuuuuuuuuuleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze! ROFL

You belong to the same type of Poles who screamed still in August '39 "Bring 'em on!" "We will show them!"
Totally overestimation of your capabilities...must be a polish thing!:)

Have you read the plans wich the German high command had planned?
Soviet intervention was more then important it was VITAL!
The eastern parts of Poland had much marshes, forests and bad roads. Without soviet union the German Wehrmacht would be sitting in mud all over their noses with tanks that were stuck in mud. Also when the winter would arrive maybe a Polish stalingrad would happened?

You should read your own literature, I have read some German history books about Plan Weiss.

I am more disgraced about how Norwegian soldiers behaved then Polish soldiers. Only the sailors behaved valiantly and patriotic!
gibbonThreads: -
Posts: 1
Joined: Sep 5, 09
  Sep 5, 09, 02:09 /  #
I see this thread is ended, and that's fine. all i wanna do is put the final touch in.

although being let down by their allies at krim and yalta and thus condemmed to another 50 years of "slavery" under the soviet union, a few facts still remain.

and this is a final nail in the coffin for all those germany-kicked-polands-ass-arguments so many here seems to belive in.

fact 1: poland was during ww2 despite having their country occupied for almost the entire war the fourth biggest of the allied nations (counting military personel), only surpassed by soviet, usa and britain.

fact 2: the allies won over the germans.

fact 3: hmm... do i really have to say it... well i guess i have to since some of you wouldn't understand it unless. poland was one of the allied nations who won (read: kicked ass) over germany.

so.... who kicked who's ass?


peace and love to you all.... let's hope it will never happen again, for in the end we all need eachother whether we like it or not.
Mr GrunwaldThreads: 34
Posts: 2,358
Joined: Dec 16, 08
  Sep 12, 09, 13:53 /  #
Harry:
Do you deny that Poland took part in Hitler's dismemberment of Czechoslovakia? If you were not Hitler's ally in that invasion, you were at least his accomplice.

I don't deny it. and I am not more proud of it. But it happened and if it happened in my times I will still stood up for it since it's my duty as a citizen.
HarryThreads: 62
Posts: 8,508
Joined: May 2, 07
[Suspended]
  Sep 12, 09, 13:56 /  #
Mr Grunwald:
if it happened in my times I will still stood up for it since it's my duty as a citizen.

It is never your duty as a citizen to invade other countries. The only time when fighting is acceptable is when one is protecting those who can not protect themselves (e.g. Kosovo). Neither of the Polish invasions of Czechoslovakia in the last 71 years is in any way justifiable.
ManghusThreads: -
Posts: 2
Joined: Sep 14, 09
  Sep 14, 09, 14:45 /  #
Harry
So British invasions were also unacceptable? Because I think they were more belligerent than most other European nations.
HarryThreads: 62
Posts: 8,508
Joined: May 2, 07
[Suspended]
  Sep 14, 09, 15:06 /  #
Manghus:
So British invasions were also unacceptable? Because I think they were more belligerent than most other European nations.

Of course they were also unacceptable.


Althought with that said, other than Germany (which was a defensive invasion) and Iraq (for which there is no excuse), I'm struggling to think of any country which Britain has invaded in the last 100 years.
ManghusThreads: -
Posts: 2
Joined: Sep 14, 09
  Sep 14, 09, 15:15 /  #
Because it changes with times. There were a lot of struggles and wars in Central Europe before WWII. And almost every country in the world has some "bad" periods like invasions but I think that most (not all) Polish wars were defensive. And after some reading I would say that British did not betray Poland (they maybe could have done more to help us). The "main" traitors were those cowards Americans. The "image" of British traitors came from Nazi and Soviet propaganda on conquered Polish lands.
AristocratThreads: -
Posts: 1
Joined: Sep 14, 09
  Sep 15, 09, 02:07 /  #
Hey what's up, I just wanted to say that in the battle of Wizna, the Poles were actually outnumbered 59:1. Pretty crazy odds. Also, not only did Germany have a non-aggression pact with Russia, but the reality is that they actually had an established coalition against Poland. Before either of them invaded they established new "to-be" boundaries between Russia and Germany. And regardless of what kind of patriotism one has, for one average European country to hold out for 3 weeks against TWO European superpowers with zero reinforcements from its "allies" is a miraculous feat of nationalism and love of one's country.

And as Joakim Broden of Sabaton said to all the Poles out there,
WE'RE GONNA GIVE'EM FORTY TO ONE!!!
gumishuThreads: 17
Posts: 3,943
Joined: Apr 6, 09
 Pictures: 1
  Sep 15, 09, 10:00 /  #
Torq:
If Czechs didn't surrender like cowards in 1938 but decided to ally themselves
with Poland instead, it would result in Germany not being able to encircle Polish
armies from the South and add some Czech troops to our forces (having very
good weapons, mainly tanks). The only problem would be to convince those
Czech divisions to actually fight *rolls eyes*

the ordinary Czech soldier was willing to fight and ready to die for his country - it was not their decision to surrender - I watch Czech tv from time to time and happened to see a document on this

page 2 of 3:  « Prev  1  2  3  Next »Go UPtop of page


Similar discussions:

Similar to: A few thoughts after plowing through most "Sabaton: 40-1" comments on YouTube
Daffy and Donald aka Lech and Jarosław Kaczyński together on tape, thoughts?
any thoughts about Norman Davies ability to present accurate history of Poland??

20th anniversary of abolishing food coupons!  Secret grave of Polish hero 'discovered'

Random: Are Polish women the fussiest shoppers in the world ??
Archives / 2009 / History of Poland /posts: 61


This forum is archived (read-only).
Category:
© 2005-2010 PolishForums.com | PolishForums LIVE | Archives | Random | Statistics