Nathan: SHOW WHERE GERMANS WERE HARSHER AND MORE BRUTAL IN EITHER KULTURKAMPF OR GERMANIZATION TOWARDS POLES AS COMPARED WITH POLISH POLONIZATION AND PACIFICATION IN THE EASTERN EUROPE. Is it hard to understand this sentence? See, that individual part isn't hard to understand. Which is why I'd originally posted the quote below:
In Prussia, and later in Germany, Poles were forbidden to build homes, and their properties were targeted for forced buy-outs financed by the Prussian and German governments. Otto von Bismarck described Poles, as animals (wolves), that "one shoots if one can" and implemented several harsh laws aiming at their expulsion from traditionally Polish lands. The Polish language was banned from public, and ethnically Polish children tortured at schools,[19] just for speaking Polish (see: Września). Poles were subjected to a wave of forceful evictions (Rugi Pruskie). German government financed and encouraged settlement of ethnic Germans into those areas aiming at their geopolitical germanisation.[20] The Prussian Landtag passed laws against Catholics.[21] Simplified: Poles were forbidden to build homes in said area. (Ukraine as well, I know) Forced buy-outs. Forced evictions. (Ukraine as well, I know) Banning of the Polish language. (Ukraine as well, I know) Children beaten (because I doubt 'tortured' is quite accurate; this is why I hate Wiki) at schools for using language. (Ukraine as well? I don't know.) Governmental aid for racial majority of occupying force to settle these lands.
Nathan: Btw., whatever your Chewbacca defense means, I use here more offense to test the truth. Right now I don't feel any defense on your side. :) Chewbacca Defense: attempt to win a debate by 'last man standing' methodology. Usually carried out by causing excessive confusion or excessive frustration until opponent just gives up and leaves. Logic being that lack of a responding post means that you win the debate.
Not to be confused with Godwin's Law: ""As an internet discussion/debate grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." "You know who else used laws to stop debates? Hitler!"
...back on topic, is this really quite so harsh as I'd originally thought it to be? Apparently not, though it's still debatably worse than Polonisation procedures in Ukrainian lands. Possibly it's not even Davies' description I was thinking of, but Zamoyski's instead. But I haven't yet seen any reason why I was wrong when I said that it was.
|