Russians prevented joint Israeli-USA/NATO chemical attack on Iran?!?

Russian military intelligence interrogators found a packet of reports, wrapped in plastic and taped to the man’s back. This packet consisted of “the highest level security matters.”

This concerned the ongoing plan to base Israeli fighter-bombers at Marneuli military airbase, 20 kilometers south of Tbilisi and that these aircraft were intended for a special air raid on the Iranian capital city of Tehran. It was originally felt that six aircraft were to be utilized, three attacking the city itself and three to attack targeted Iranian oil facilities.

The captured Israeli’s papers, all written in Hebrew, when translated by the Russian GRU turned out to be somewhat different in nature. While one flight was indeed intended to attack various Iranian oil facilities, the second flight was planned to drop chemical warfare bombs on Tehran. These bombs, which were designed to blow open at a set altitude, were filled with weapons-grade anthrax and this anthrax, kept in a specially sealed box at the U.S. diplomatic offices in Tiblisi, came from Fr. Detrick in Maryland and their shipment had the approval of the President himself.

They did it to Serbians.

I believe. I believe in every single word of rapport

USA, EU and NATO already shown that they are capable for use of nuclear, high-tech and chemical weapon on civilians in modern time and there are many rapports about it in media and on the Net. USA, EU and NATO did it in Europe. They did it to Serbians.

********. You believe? Very gullible. I'm a millionaire, give me your bank details and I'll send you £3million!

Who's army? O.o

********.

You believe?

Very gullible.

I'm a millionaire,

give me your bank details and I'll send you £3million!

ah, that isn`t necessery. Sooner or later, this way or another, with payment or without it, Serbians would `repay` you in double

The comedian of PF

but it always must sound like a good fun and commedy

Crow:
but it always must sound like a good fun and commedy


Oh you can say that again!

USA, EU and NATO already shown that they are capable for use of nuclear, high-tech and chemical weapon on civilians in modern time and there are many rapports about it in media and on the Net. USA, EU and NATO did it in Europe. They did it to Serbians.

I must have missed the bit when NATO nuked Belgrade. Which year was it?

I must have missed the bit when NATO nuked Belgrade. Which year was it?

I must have missed the bit when NATO nuked Belgrade

These were tiny nukes

there are different kind of nuclear weapons

On Serbians, NATO used missiles with depleted uranium and that`s not secret, it`s well known in international comunity

Depleted Uranium is not a nuclear weapon.

The use of depleted uranium weaponry by the United States, defying all international treaties, will slowly annihilate all species on earth including the human species, and yet this country continues to do so with full knowledge of its destructive potential.

The fact is that the United States and its military partners have staged four nuclear wars, "slipping nukes under the wire" by using dirty bombs and dirty weapons in countries the US needs to control. Depleted uranium aerosols will permanently contaminate vast regions and slowly destroy the genetic future of populations living in those regions, where there are resources which the US must control, in order to establish and maintain American primacy.

Described as the Trojan Horse of nuclear war, depleted uranium is the weapon that keeps killing. The half-life of Uranium-238 is 4.5 billion years, the age of the earth. And, as Uranium-238 decays into daughter radioactive products, in four steps before turning into lead, it continues to release more radiation at each step. There is no way to turn it off, and there is no way to clean it up. It meets the US Government’s own definition of Weapons of Mass Destruction.

DU weapons kill because of the kinetic energy they have not because of any 'nuclear' effects.

I believe. I believe in every single word of rapport

Depleted Uranium is not a nuclear weapon. The material is used because it is very dense. DU weapons kill because of the kinetic energy they have not because of any 'nuclear' effects.

I must have missed the bit when NATO nuked Belgrade. Which year was it?

For years, the U.S. and NATO fired DU missiles, bullets and shells across the Balkans, nuking the peoples of Serbia, Bosnia and Kosovo. As DU munitions were slammed into chemical plants, the environment became hideously toxic, also endangering the peoples of Albania, Macedonia, Greece, Italy, Austria and Hungary. By 1999, UN investigators reported that an estimated 12 tons of DU had caused irreparable damage to the Yugoslavian environment, with agriculture, livestock and air water, and public health all profoundly damaged.38

Scientists confirm that citizens of the Balkans are excreting uranium in their urine.39 In 2001, a Yugoslavian pathologist reported that hundreds of Bosnians have died of cancer from NATO's DU bombardment.40 Many NATO peacekeepers in the Balkans now suffer ill health. Their leukemias, cancers and other maladies are dubbed the "Balkans Syndrome." Richard Coghill predicts that DU weapons used in Balkans campaign will result in at least 10,000 cases of fatal cancer.41

Depleted Uranium is not a nuclear weapon

Some DU ingested through breathing and wounds lodges permanently in bones and tissue, and acts as a chemical and radiological toxin for the remainder of a person's presumably-shortened lifetime. The Military Toxins Project reports that "large numbers of children near contaminated areas have developed leukemias and other health problems" likely associated with exposure to DU.

Sources:

"Collateral Damage: How U.S. Troops Were Exposed to Depleted Uranium
During the Persian Gulf War," Dan Fahey, Swords to Plowshares Depleted
Uranium Network of the Military Toxins Project.

U.S. Army Environmental Policy Institute: Health and Environmental
Consequences of Depleted Uranium in the U.S. Army, Technical Report,
June 1995.

U.S. General Accounting Office, Operation Desert Storm: "Early
Performance Assessment of Bradley and Abrams," January 2, 1992.

The Nation Magazine, October 21, 1996, "The Pentagon's Radioactive
Bullet" by Bill Mesler.

Firstly, if the US wanted to kill people by using radioactive materials, they would use one rather more radioactive than the low-level DU.

Secondly, funny how none of our Russian friends have so much as a single word to say about their own army's use of DU, cluster munitions, Thermobaric weapons (i.e. Fuel/Air explosives), white phosphorus, napalm, chemical weapons and other high-tech weapons against civilians. In fact, Russia is the only member-state of the Chemical Weapons Convention which has used chemical weapons against civilians. Another proud boast you won't hear from our friends.

It's strange how they only attack weaker countries who don't have the capability to respond with equal force.

Firstly, if the US wanted to kill people by using radioactive materials, they would use one rather more radioactive than the low-level DU.

(possibly about the same as a glow in the dark watch?)

In fact, Russia is the only member-state of the Chemical Weapons Convention which has used chemical weapons against civilians. Another proud boast you won't hear from our friends.

so far how many valid sources show a large increase in death due to radiation poisoning, in say, Iraq-or Chechnya?

Sick soldiers

Only 467 US soldiers were officially wounded during the 1990-91 Gulf war.

But according to Terry Jemison at the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), of the more than 592,560 discharged personnel who served there, at least 179,310 - one third - are receiving disability compensation and over 24,760 cases were pending by in September 2004.

Health

Uranium blamed for Gulf War Syndrome