szkotja2007: The link is over a year old. Although still relevant if it's still happening. ;)
Seanus: Exactly, it's not about exclusion at all. It's analogous to teaching in that I'd devote a little extra attention to a student who was lagging behind but not at the expense of the learning development of others who have paid the same money. Outright bans often serve no constructive purpose. I'm with you on that. Which is why extra funding/resources needs to be applied to allow classes to be split, if they have to be, even for short times as card-making.
Outright bans serve no constructive purpose and let's be real here, they are only made to satisfy the parents and sooth them.
|