Quoting: iwona, Post #27
I think that Kochana Babcia is right. It depends on people income where they live.
Place where I live now is nice new estate with good schools and I can see any people living here eatern european, Black, Asian......I know that most families are attracted by good schools.
I would say that people are more divided by social status than race.
Social status and race are two rams butting heads. When put to the test race will always have the higher probability of being the decisive factor.
When people of different races intermingle, be it due to free will or being forced, the race factor becomes slightly passive. Social status immediately has no other choice but to come to the forefront. But social status is one of an unstable nature, it is allowed to exert its force at the whim of race. Race remains underneath, like a snoozing oversear.
I'm sure you know what a bear trap is. You can put your hand inside one and you will be fine as long you don't hit the trigger and close the trap. Social status is like that hand in the bear trap. As long as you tiptoe around and be careful, the trap is harmless. But one wrong move and the power of the trap (race) will quickly let you know who's boss.
This is exemplified in how easily a person's repuation and social status can be destroyed when that trap shuts. Recent example include politicians and comedians:
1) Former U.S. Senator George Allen points to a Webb aide, referring to him as "Macaca".
2) Kramer (Micheal Richards) from Seinfeld went on a race laden tirade in a public venue.
In both cases race immediately, like a 500 pound gorilla, overtook the little mouse that is social status. You can't escape race. You can't run from it, hide from it, or avoid it.
When I say race I also include ethnicities/blood. As for religion, it is the monkey wrench in the whole equation.