Now, this is topic that greately intrigues me.
In general, it is accepted that Greaks and Romans gave fundaments to `democracy` and civilization. But feel free to forget about it. Actualy there are numerous spirits that would tell you that fundaments of modern `democracy` and civilization ultimately beggining to develop inside of early Slavic (Proto-Slavic) societies.
Are you aware of great Polish contribution to begginings of democracy and modern concept of civilization?
Let me remind you...
Sarmatism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarmatism
What contemporary Polish historians consider one of the most essential features of this tradition is not Sarmatian ideology but the manner in which the Rzeczpospolita was governed. The democratic concepts of law and order, self-government and elective offices constituted an inseparable part of Sarmatism. The king, though elected, still held the central position in the state, but his power was limited by various legal acts and requirements. Moreover, only the nobles were given political rights, namely the vote in the Sejmik and the Sejm. Every poseł (or member of sejm, had the right to exercise the so-called liberum veto, which could block the passage of a proposed new resolution or law. Finally, in the event that the king failed to abide by the laws of the state, or tried to limit or question nobles’ privileges, they had the right to refuse the king’s commands, and to oppose him by force of arms. But, `Sarmatism` isn`t only reminder of Polish/Slavic contribution to fundaments of `democracy`.
Spot this and compare it with above quotation...
Parliament
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament
Origins of parliamentary government
Ancient Indian, Vedic texts mention of two Parliament-like gatherings of the Indo-Aryan kingdoms called the Sabhā and the Samiti. During the time of the Buddha, many states were forms of republics, called the Sanghas. The Sabha has been interpreted by the historians as a representative assembly of the elect—the important men of the clan, which ran day-to-day business with the king. The Samiti seems to be a gathering of all the male members of the kingdom, and probably convened only for the ratification/election of a new king. The two largely democratic institutions, which kept a check on the absolutism of the king, were given a sacred position, and have been called the daughters of the deity Prajapati in the Vedas, the holiest of all Hindu scriptures and the earliest Indo-European literature. However, these democratic institutions became weaker as republics became larger and elected chieftainship moved towards hereditary and absolute monarchy. NOTE: Inscriptions from Vedic texts are interesting here because Rg Veda`s reffering on Sarmatian/Scythian (Proto Slavic) cultural influence on Indian tradition. It is well known that Buddha was white and of Scythian origin. Buddha belonged to ruling lighter caste of Indian society. The term Buddha means `Awakened` and even today any Slav would recognize such a menaing of name `Buda (Buddha)` from the angle of Slavic languages.
for example, on modern day Serbian language... Probudjeni > proBudjeni > Budni (always meaning- one who is awaken)... Buda (Buddha)
|