PolishForums.com
POLAND . The Unofficial Guide
Unanswered | Archives
"Polska" means "Poland" in Polish! Witamy, Guest | PF Members | Gold Members

Polish Forums / History of Poland /

Is J霩ef Pi連udski the king of modern Poles?


page 4 of 4:  « Prev  1  2  3  4 posts: 114

Ozi DanThreads: 22
Posts: 552
Joined: Nov 22, 07
 Sep 3, 10, 09:04    #91
plk123:
was a de facto dictator..


jasinski:
he was a reluctant dictator.


A benevolent dictator perhaps, but a great man nevertheless. Most Poles here in Oz have reliefs or pictures of him on the lounge room wall.

Seanus:
Some would say he was just an imperialistic terrorist who personally profitted from killing.


Pilsudski? Why would you say that?

plk123Threads: 30
Posts: 6,412
Joined: Aug 29, 07
 Pictures: 2
 Sep 3, 10, 10:35    #92
Ozi Dan:
Seanus:
Some would say he was just an imperialistic terrorist who personally profitted from killing.


Pilsudski? Why would you say that?

well, he did forward the idea of "miedzymorze" which one could describe as imperialistic; same with the aggressions with ukraine and czechs.. terrorist part i dunno... seanus????
hague1cmaeronThreads: 21
Posts: 1,652
Joined: Mar 30, 10
 Sep 3, 10, 12:04    #93
Bratwurst Boy:
Any links to those "unbelievable" amounts?


I don't know about the numbers, but some prominent generals, definitely.


Franciszek Kleeberg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franciszek_Kleeberg

Juliusz R鏔mel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juliusz_R%C3%B3mmel

apparently a relative of the desert fox
JozefKPilsudskiThreads: 3
Posts: 18
Joined: Jun 24, 11
 Pictures: 1
 Jul 5, 11, 23:36    #94
Merged: What Are Your Thought On Jozef Pi連udski?

I'm 14, born in Britain and am half Polish.
My family in Poland absolutely love Pi連udski and both my great-Grandfathers fought in his army during the Polish-Soviet War.

My question is:
What do my fellow Poles think about my hero, Jozef Pi連udski?

Thanks.
IronsideThreads: 59
Posts: 6,786
Joined: Feb 26, 09
 Jul 5, 11, 23:41    #95
He was OK.
One of the rare successful statesman from Poland in the last 300 years.
RobertLeeThreads: 12
Posts: 133
Joined: May 26, 11
Edited by: RobertLee  Jul 6, 11, 00:05    #96
JozefKPilsudski:
What do my fellow Poles think about my hero, Jozef Pi連udski?

Well, he did some great things for Poland and one has to admit that he was great Polish patriot, but he also did some very stupid things: like when he went to Japan asking for support of Polish uprising against Russia, which would result in just another bloodshed. Or when he organized a military coup d'etat. He was too crude and had too difficult, authoritarian character to be more successful politician in and outside of Poland.
I actually believe his political adversary Roman Dmowski had a better vision for Poland (he also went to Japan to... discourage the Japanese from supporting Pi連udki's plans).
JonnyMThreads: 16
Posts: 4,487
Joined: Mar 9, 11
Edited by: JonnyM  Jul 6, 11, 02:01    #97
RobertLee:
I actually believe his political adversary Roman Dmowski had a better vision for Poland

Perhaps you believe that because he was an outspoken racist and fascist, which the great Pilsudski, a true hero, was most certainly not.
hague1cmaeronThreads: 21
Posts: 1,652
Joined: Mar 30, 10
 Jul 6, 11, 04:17    #98
JozefKPilsudski:
I'm 14, born in Britain and am half Polish.
My family in Poland absolutely love Pi連udski and both my great-Grandfathers fought in his army during the Polish-Soviet War.

My question is:
What do my fellow Poles think about my hero, Jozef Pi連udski?

Thanks.


In case you haven't seen this before: Pilsudski celebrating the battle of Vienna in Krakow in 1933-My relative's wife has the original photographs from that event on display in her restaurant in Krakow.


RobertLeeThreads: 12
Posts: 133
Joined: May 26, 11
 Jul 6, 11, 11:32    #99
JonnyM:
Perhaps you believe that because he was an outspoken racist and fascist, which the great Pilsudski, a true hero, was most certainly not.

Perhaps you believe that because in your gay leftist mindset, you feel threathened by the words "patriot" and "nation".
It's easy for politically correct ignorants with foam on their mouths to put labels on Dmowski NOW, but his fellow countrymen respected and loved him.
PolskiMocThreads: 7
Posts: 488
Joined: Mar 15, 10
[Suspended]
 Jul 6, 11, 12:57    #100
JonnyM:
Perhaps you believe that because he was an outspoken racist and fascist, which the great Pilsudski, a true hero, was most certainly not.


Pilsudski was the first in a nation to stand up to Communists & Nazis.
If the West had followed Pilsudski there would have been no Nazis or Soviet Union.

Yes, I wonder why Brits love Oliver Cromwell when he was a Dictator who opressed Celtic people? Hmm?

I guess it is okay for Brits to love Fascist type people but it is not okay for anyone else huh? Am I right or am I right?
JonnyMThreads: 16
Posts: 4,487
Joined: Mar 9, 11
 Jul 6, 11, 15:10    #101
RobertLee:
to put labels on Dmowski NOW

Because certain labels fit. Fascist is one - it was a label that fit at the time and still fits aptly. In his writings (I assume you've read Dmowski and aren't just shooting your mouth off) he openly admired Mussolini and Dollfuss, and espoused the fascist cause. Racist, certainly, from his first book, Thoughts of a young Pole, throught the least pleasant passages of Polityka Polska i odbudowanie pa雟twa right through to organising boycotts of businesses based on their ownership.
RobertLee:
words "patriot" and "nation".

Describing Dmowski as a patriot is interesting, especially as he initially(and strongly) supported the idea of Poland as an autonomous region of Russia. To talk about 'nation' too is odd - among the shared cultural values that make the Polish nation, both Christianity and tolerance play a large part - Dmowski despised both.

He was not fit to lick the boots of Pilsudski and Narutowicz.
RobertLeeThreads: 12
Posts: 133
Joined: May 26, 11
Edited by: RobertLee  Jul 6, 11, 16:09    #102
JonnyM:
Because certain labels fit. Fascist is one - it was a label that fit at the time and still fits aptly. In his writings (I assume you've read Dmowski and aren't just shooting your mouth off) he openly admired Mussolini and Dollfuss, and espoused the fascist cause. Racist, certainly, from his first book, Thoughts of a young Pole, throught the least pleasant passages of Polityka Polska i odbudowanie pa雟twa right through to organising boycotts of businesses based on their ownership.

How a Polish patriot from the first half of the 20th century could not be "racist" when Poles were opressed or threathened by other nationalities? You could also compare pre-war Poland to today's USA, but the only thing you can prove this way is that you are nuts.

JonnyM:

Describing Dmowski as a patriot is interesting, especially as he initially(and strongly) supported the idea of Poland as an autonomous region of Russia.

Dmowski played absolutely crucial role in the process of regaining Polish independence. He organized the Blue Army without which Poland would probably lose the war with Ukrainians and Soviets. Unlike Pi連udski, who was a crude soldier, Dmowski was educated and diplomatic and was able to successfully lobby for Polish cause in the Versailles.
Whether or not that Dmowski statement was sincere to Russians is debatable, but one thing is certain: at that time there was no Poland at all, so an autonomous region within Russia was certainly better than no Poland at all, especially given the fact that the Russians were somehow less successful at russification of Poles, than the Germans were at germanization.

JonnyM:

To talk about 'nation' too is odd - among the shared cultural values that make the Polish nation, both Christianity and tolerance play a large part - Dmowski despised both.

Here you have all those despised Christians attending his funeral:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZWUEEQrVN0

JonnyM:

He was not fit to lick the boots of Pilsudski and Narutowicz.

Pi連udski, despite his disagreements with Dmowski, was a big enough Pole to appreciate what Dmowski did for Poland. You are not.
pawianThreads: 90
Posts: 5,395
Joined: May 30, 08
 Pictures: 2
Edited by: pawian  Jul 6, 11, 16:24    #103
jasinski:
Is J霩ef Pi連udski the king of modern Poles?



He contributed a lot to Poland regaining independence in 1918 but later on he abolished democracy and introduced the military semi-dictatorship in Poland. A very controvercial person.

Certainly he isn`t my spiritual king.
JonnyMThreads: 16
Posts: 4,487
Joined: Mar 9, 11
Edited by: JonnyM  Jul 6, 11, 16:28    #104
RobertLee:
How a Polish patriot from the first half of the 20th century could not be "racist" when Poles were opressed or threathened by other nationalities?

Quite easily, many including Pilsudski were not.
RobertLee:
Whether or not that Dmowski statement was sincere to Russians is debatable

His own writings and actions at the time leave no room for debate about his views. Pilsudski strongly (and wisely) opposed him tooth and nail on this matter. If he had not, the history of Europe may well have been very different.
RobertLee:
especially given the fact that the Russians were somehow less successful at russification of Poles, than the Germans were at germanization.

Lifted pretty well word for word from Wikipedia. So you really are talking about matters you don't understand.
RobertLee:
all those despised Christians

Read what he actually wrote about Christianity - he detested its values. He also detested the concepts of tolerance, diversity and liberalism - which may well have contributed to his failure and Pilsudski's success.
RobertLee:
Pi連udski, despite his disagreements with Dmowski, was a big enough Pole to appreciate what Dmowski did for Poland. You are not.

This from someone a continent away who has contributed nothing to Poland and only likes the idea of Dmowski because of his openly racist views.

Pilsudski, on the other hand (who loathed Dmowski and his ilk) was a true Polish patriot, liberal, tolerant and at the same timke both idealistic and pragmatic. What by the way is your take on Pilsudski's contemporary and ally, President Narutowicz?
joepilsudskiThreads: 44
Posts: 2,529
Joined: Apr 27, 07
 Pictures: 1
 Jul 6, 11, 17:48    #105
BTW, Pilsudski was not a king...He was a soldier and leader who founded the modern Polish state...He also had no particular flair for diplomatic and political subtlety.

Dmowski was a technocrat, no?...He didn't care for music.
sobieskiThreads: 82
Posts: 1,143
Joined: Jun 1, 08
 Jul 6, 11, 17:58    #106
joepilsudski:
Dmowski was a technocrat, no?.

Dmowski was an antisemite who thought Poland belonged to the "birthers". Pi連udski was - for all his shortcomings - a cosmopolitan and the true Father of modern Poland.
RobertLeeThreads: 12
Posts: 133
Joined: May 26, 11
 Jul 6, 11, 18:29    #107
JonnyM:
Quite easily, many including Pilsudski were not.

Like I said, Pi連udski was a rough man, who didn't write books. That's the only evidence of his lack of "racism" as understood from today's perspective.

JonnyM:
His own writings and actions at the time leave no room for debate about his views. Pilsudski strongly (and wisely) opposed him tooth and nail on this matter. If he had not, the history of Europe may well have been very different.

Without Dmowski's and Paderewski's work Poland would be too weak to oppose the Soviets. There would be no opportunity for Pi連udski to build his legend. No to mention the fact that the history of Europe would be very different.

JonnyM:
Lifted pretty well word for word from Wikipedia.

Really? That would mean that hatred towards Dmowski is a hobby of a small group of Polish leftists and foreigners, while the most of society recognizes him as a great patriot. Do you get foam on your mouth every time you drive through this?:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=&ie=UTF8&om=1&z=17&ll=52.22980 4,21.012082&spn=0.004876,0.010042&t=k

JonnyM:
Read what he actually wrote about Christianity - he detested its values. He also detested the concepts of tolerance, diversity and liberalism - which may well have contributed to his failure and Pilsudski's success.

Dmowski wrote much stuff over a period of long time - in particular his views of Christianity evolved a lot, which you somehow failed to mention. Speaking of tolerance, liberalism and Pi連udski in one sentence - well, you made me laugh.

JonnyM:
This from someone a continent away who has contributed nothing to Poland

What did you contribute to Poland?

JonnyM:
Pilsudski, on the other hand (who loathed Dmowski and his ilk) was a true Polish patriot, liberal, tolerant and at the same timke both idealistic and pragmatic.

Pi連udski didn't loath Dmowski, he respected him for what he did for Poland. Only a bunch of Polish leftists (surprisingly often gay) and foreigners loath him - in the first case probably because Dmowski became adopted hero of some ultra right-wing groups (which is not his fault) - in the second case - because he put the interests of Poles above anything else.
Most of his ideas are of course no longer suitable for modern-day Poland, but so is the politics of Pi連udski, unless you want somebody to organize a coup d'etat, killing several hundred Poles and establishing authoritarian rule. But it doesn't mean the two weren't Polish patriots back in their time.

JonnyM:
What by the way is your take on Pilsudski's contemporary and ally, President Narutowicz?

I would be happy to learn more about him.
joepilsudskiThreads: 44
Posts: 2,529
Joined: Apr 27, 07
 Pictures: 1
 Jul 6, 11, 22:02    #108
sobieski:
Dmowski was an antisemite who thought Poland belonged to the "birthers". Pi連udski was - for all his shortcomings - a cosmopolitan and the true Father of modern Poland.


You oversimplify, to the extreme...By birthers, you mean Poland belonging to native Poles?...What an outrageous idea!

Pilsudski a 'cosmopolitan'?...What, did he patronize a coffee house in his youth?
RobertLeeThreads: 12
Posts: 133
Joined: May 26, 11
Edited by: RobertLee  Jul 6, 11, 22:34    #109
sobieski:
Dmowski was an antisemite

joepilsudski:
You oversimplify, to the extreme...By birthers, you mean Poland belonging to native Poles?...What an outrageous idea!

I don't even know why he brought that up. Perhaps he thinks that a person's attitude towards Jews is the most important factor, by which we should judge whether or not somebody was a Polish patriot - the nicer for Jews, the greater the patriotism, of course.
Seriously, is there any area of Polish affairs which should not be evaluated in terms of it's influence on Jewish well-being? Hint: it's getting boring.
JonnyMThreads: 16
Posts: 4,487
Joined: Mar 9, 11
 Jul 7, 11, 13:49    #110
RobertLee:
Like I said, Pi連udski was a rough man, who didn't write books.

Actually quite educated and very, very cultured.
RobertLee:
That would mean that hatred towards Dmowski is a hobby of a small group of Polish leftists and foreigners, while the most of society recognizes him as a great patriot.

Here in Poland he's largely a footnote in history, whereas Marshal Pilsudski is regarded as the father of the modern nation.
RobertLee:
Only a bunch of Polish leftists (surprisingly often gay) and foreigners loath him -

A weird thing to say.
RobertLee:
Most of his ideas are of course no longer suitable for modern-day Poland, but so is the politics of Pi連udski, unless you want somebody to organize a coup d'etat, killing several hundred Poles and establishing authoritarian rule. But it doesn't mean the two weren't Polish patriots back in their time.

One issue is that Pilsudski was quite realistic about his role and its pragnatic place in history whereas Dmowski the demagogue, ever sniping at Poland's leadership from the sidelines and organising boycotts when he didn't agree with election results had rather less humility.
RobertLee:
I don't even know why he brought that up. Perhaps he thinks that a person's attitude towards Jews is the most important factor, by which we should judge whether or not somebody was a Polish patriot

At that time and place in history, when many people were both Poes and Jews, it is significant. And again, the great Pilsudski is to be admired for his actions.
joepilsudskiThreads: 44
Posts: 2,529
Joined: Apr 27, 07
 Pictures: 1
 Jul 7, 11, 20:35    #111
JonnyM:
And again, the great Pilsudski is to be admired for his actions.


Thank you Johnny, and I will do my very best never to get a swelled head.
JonnyMThreads: 16
Posts: 4,487
Joined: Mar 9, 11
 Jul 7, 11, 20:39    #112
joepilsudski:
Thank you Johnny, and I will do my very best never to get a swelled head.

With pleasure Joe - and be careful not to get a swelled head - it sounds like a serious medical emergency!
IronsideThreads: 59
Posts: 6,786
Joined: Feb 26, 09
 Jul 7, 11, 20:52    #113
JonnyM:
At that time and place in history, when many people were both Poes and Jews, it is significant.

Why? Could you elaborate ?
snakeThreads: 1
Posts: 2
Joined: Jul 7, 11
 Jul 7, 11, 21:22    #114
Marshall Pi連udski was outstanding Polish politician, but nowadays Central European reality is diametrically different than before Second World War.


page 4 of 4:  « Prev  1  2  3  4

Home / History of Poland / Unanswered [this forum] | Similar


Similar discussions:

Is There A Polish Foreign Legion?  General Anders and one of the biggest "What Ifs?" of WW2


Random: Looking for a room/ appartment in Warsaw February till June 2012

Only registered and logged-in users may post here. Please log in or register.


62 [Guests - 49 / Members - 13] users on live forums now


Home | Unanswered | Archives | Random | Statistics Time in Poland: 18:15 / May 26

About Us | Contact Us | Rules, Privacy | Poland Advertising

© 2005-12 PolishForums.com