PolishForums.com
POLAND . The Unofficial Guide
Unanswered | Archives
Meet Polish People at PF! Witamy, Guest | PF Members | Gold Members

Polish Forums / History of Poland /

Lord Conway's rule and Poland in 1772


page 1 of 2:  1  2  Next » posts: 35

IronsideThreads: 59
Posts: 6,786
Joined: Feb 26, 09
 Mar 31, 10, 11:37    #1
According to lord Conway "Poland is the least important to Britain of all Europe".

jonniThreads: 26
Posts: 4,181
Joined: Nov 27, 07
 Mar 31, 10, 11:44    #2
Ironside:
Lord Conway's rule

Probably true but what's he supposed to have "ruled", except the island of Jersey and that briefly?
jedenThreads: -
Posts: 297
Joined: Nov 30, 09
Edited by: jeden  Mar 31, 10, 11:44    #3
UK ddoesn`t have friends or allies , Uk has interest, business.

The Uk ( in general west) thinking is different than our...

UK`s never had brother country. We have.

For west countries the most important is reason of state, for us brotherhood and honor...

Different values. that`s all
jonniThreads: 26
Posts: 4,181
Joined: Nov 27, 07
 Mar 31, 10, 11:56    #4
jeden:
For west countries the most important is reason of state, for us brotherhood and honor...

I'm not sure the Czechs or Lithuanians would agree with that. In any case the UK is an island whose traditional alliances have been with countries far away - that has shaped perceptions of European countries who more often than not have dragged them into problems.
IronsideThreads: 59
Posts: 6,786
Joined: Feb 26, 09
 Mar 31, 10, 12:27    #5
jonni:
Probably true but what's he supposed to have "ruled", except the island of Jersey and that briefly?

He said what was the policy of Britain in regard to Poland.
I may add that Britain supported certain German state till about 1870s !

jeden:
UK`s never had brother country. We have.

What are you about?please make yourself scarce ..

jonni:
I'm not sure the Czechs or Lithuanians would agree with that.

That's not a point, point is do they have ample reasons to complain ? I say not!
jonniThreads: 26
Posts: 4,181
Joined: Nov 27, 07
Edited by: jonni  Mar 31, 10, 12:33    #6
Ironside:
He said what was the policy of Britain in regard to Poland.

I can also say what Britain's policy is. Though since I'm not the Premier or the Foreign Secretary nobody would care. In 1772, Lord Conway was a backbencher with a role in domestic affairs and the Governor of Jersey.

Ironside:
I may add that Britain supported certain German state till about 1870s

I should hope so too!

As an aside I wonder what Poland's policy towards Britain was at that time?
IronsideThreads: 59
Posts: 6,786
Joined: Feb 26, 09
 Mar 31, 10, 12:57    #7
jonni:
I can also say what Britain's policy is. Though since I'm not the Premier or the Foreign Secretary nobody would care. In 1772, Lord Conway was a backbencher with a role in domestic affairs and the Governor of Jersey.

Well, Are you part of establishment, part of the ruling class? if so, I'm all ears :)

jonni:
I should hope so too!

Well, Germans have a reason to be grateful:)


jonni:
what Poland's policy towards Britain was at that time?

I have no idea, most likely nobody bothered to voice an opinion on the subject.
Although many a very influential people in Poland were at the time taken in by Britain for example Prince August Czartoryski - and King Stanis³aw August :)
jedenThreads: -
Posts: 297
Joined: Nov 30, 09
Edited by: jeden  Mar 31, 10, 13:57    #8
What are you about?please make yourself scarce ..

I`m talking about Hungary... There are o lot of threads even on this forum about our brotherhood. (it`s not an alliance, it`s not even friendship it`s more ) If you are english , probably You won`t understand this issue--- different values.;)


Brave Czechs died about 1620... 1/4 nation died in war... The rest act like cowards now, but I can understand them. They chosed their way.

Lithuenians are not Slavs.
jonniThreads: 26
Posts: 4,181
Joined: Nov 27, 07
 Mar 31, 10, 19:04    #9
Ironside:
Prince August Czartoryski - and King Stanis³aw August :)

They were certainly Anglophiles, though in King Stanis³aw August's case Scotophile would be more accurate. I'm trying to remember the Latin nickname he was given in Britain - it was quite apposite.
ZiemowitThreads: 10
Posts: 1,063
Joined: May 8, 09
Edited by: Ziemowit  Mar 31, 10, 20:26    #10
jonni:
As an aside I wonder what Poland's policy towards Britain was at that time?

Nearly 20 years later there happened something that could have spared Poland the fate of partitions. Wiliam Pitt the Younger wanted to curb Russia's strengh assuring at the same time safety to Turkey and Poland in order to restore the balance of power in Europe. So England, Prussia and Holland in coallition demanded that Russia signed a peace treaty with Turkey with the status quo ante, but Catherine II refused saying Rusia must keep at least Oczaków and the lands towards the Dniestr river that she conquered on Turkey in 1788.

British ambassador in St. Petersburgh, Lord Whitworth, was convinced that time had come to force Catherine II to concessions. But England could only challange Russia if she could have assured timber supply for building her ships from another source than Russia. That other source of timber could only be Poland.

Poland would have been a beter trading partner to Britain than Russia (Britain's trade deficit with Russia was nearly one million pounds a year) as Poland imported a lot more of English produce, and a lot of Russian goods were originally from the eastern part of the Polish Cmmonwealth, shipped through the Russian port of Riga. William Pitt carried on talks on the issue with Franciszek Bukaty, the Polish ambassador in London, and with Micha³ Ogiñski, the Polish representative in Hague. Any trade agreement between England and Poland implied the participation of Prussia, however, but Prussia, knowing its strong stance in the deal, let their partners know that they would cooperate only if Poland concedes the city of Gdañsk and the city of Toruñ to them. In other words, the entire plan of Wiliam Pitt the Younger to curb Russia, to which plan he won Sweden, Turkey, Danmark and Holland, was based on the assumed ceding of Gdañsk and Toruñ by Poland to Prussia.
(to be continued)
Bratwurst BoyThreads: 11
Posts: 14,563
Joined: Apr 2, 07
 Mar 31, 10, 20:29    #11
jeden:
I`m talking about Hungary... There are o lot of threads even on this forum about our brotherhood. (it`s not an alliance, it`s not even friendship it`s more )

Yeah, that's why Hungary allied with Germany in both world wars...;)
jonniThreads: 26
Posts: 4,181
Joined: Nov 27, 07
 Mar 31, 10, 20:31    #12
It's why Pitt was such a controversial genius - have you read Carlyle on the 2nd republic?
StuThreads: 27
Posts: 1,109
Joined: Mar 31, 10
 Mar 31, 10, 20:35    #13
No, Jeden ... that's true! We will never understand this loyalty to the Nazi's. Seems to me that you shot yourself in the foot, didn't you :D?
ZiemowitThreads: 10
Posts: 1,063
Joined: May 8, 09
 Mar 31, 10, 20:36    #14
No, I haven't. What's the title of the book?
jonniThreads: 26
Posts: 4,181
Joined: Nov 27, 07
Edited by: jonni  Mar 31, 10, 20:46    #15
I assume it's 'On Heroes', though it might be the 'Critical Essays'. He writes about it in the context of Prussia - he was no admirer of the Second Rzeczpospolita, to say the least. I'll see if I can find a reference.

If I remember, he wrote critically about the first partition though said (very much in his style - in the same essay he called the Tsarina of Russia ‘mainly a mass of esurient oil’) that "‘deliverance from anarchy, pestilence, famine and pigs eating your dead body was a manifest advantage for Poland and the one way of saving Europe from war".

There was also an essay which touched on Chopin's early life and quite a bit about earlier history, especially August II Mocny.
jedenThreads: -
Posts: 297
Joined: Nov 30, 09
Edited by: jeden  Apr 3, 10, 11:38    #16
I said about this BB.

More Than Just a Common Border



After the Greman invasion of Poland in 1939 from the West, North and South
(from Czech and Slovakian territory) on the 1st of September 1939, and then
the Soviet aggression from the East on September 17th, the Polish-Hungarian
border became a blessing for many Poles.

In those hard days, Hungarians have proven once again that there was more
than just a common border that connects Poles and Hungarians.

Many times from early spring until September 1939, Hungarians let the Germans
know that they cannot count on them to take part in any kind of operation
against Poland.

In his speech from 27th April 1939, answering the German demands for military acces,
Hungarian foreign affairs minister - count István Csáky said:

"Whoever shall cross the Hungarian border without our consent will be considered
our enemy (...) If Germans try to do it, it will lead to a disaster. Common sympathy
between Polish and Hunagrian nations have with centuries turned into an alliance,
alliance that is not written on the paper but very much real and valid".

One Minute Was Enough




Admiral Miklós Horthy, regent of Hungary, not minding the consequences refused
Hitler the military access before the nazi invasion of Poland.

Just before the 1st of September 1939, Germany demanded the military access through
Hungarian territory for the troops to be transported for the attack on Poland.
The Hungarian Council of State under the leadership of regent Miklós Horthy needed
just one minute of session to answer unanimously "NO!".


Germans Try to Bribe and Then to Threaten Hungarians

Nazis, surprised by the Hungarian refusal, offered Hungary a part of Polish territory
in the Sambor area and when that failed they send a harsh diplomatic note from
the foreign affairs minister Joachim von Ribbentrop threatening Hungarians with
consequences if they refuse.

However, the Prime Minister of Hungary - Pál Teleki, said that:

"From the Hungarian point of view, it is a matter of national honour
not to take part in any kind of military action against Poland".




Count Pál Teleki, prime minister of the Kingdom of Hungary government.

After the fall of Poland, 140-150 thousand Polish refugees found shelter
in Hungary, together with many Polish organisations which had full freedom
of activity and support of Hungarian government (in spite of Hungary being
officialy an ally of the Third Reich).

Those noble deeds of Hungarians were a continuation of the 1000 years of brothership
between Hungarian and Polish nations, which started in the times of first royal families
of Piasts and Arpads.

Éljen Magyarország!

Long live Hungary! Long live Polish-Hungarian friendship!

„Lengyel, magyar – két jó barát, együtt harcol, s issza borát.”
„Polak, Wêgier, dwa bratanki, i do szabli, i do szklanki.”

STU

Seems to me that you shot yourself in the foot, didn't you :D?

NO

Hungarian weren`t nazis. They were only german short term allie.

I`m proud to be brother for Hungarians. Their help to Poland in 1939 was probably bigger than English, even they were opponents, and England was allie...

Like I quote above they didn1t allow Germany to attack Poland from south. England did nothing. ( in 1939)
grubasThreads: 20
Posts: 1,452
Joined: Feb 1, 10
 Pictures: 1
 Apr 3, 10, 12:02    #17
Exactly,they were under German pressure but did what they could to help Poles who were trying to reach France. Hail to Hungarians!!!
Bratwurst BoyThreads: 11
Posts: 14,563
Joined: Apr 2, 07
Edited by: Bratwurst Boy  Apr 3, 10, 13:44    #18
jeden:
Hungarian weren`t nazis. They were only german short term allie.


They were also allies in WWI and got punished with land loss like the Germans...they are also still hurting from it (whereas Poles profited). They had the same reasons to go to war in WWII again like Germany!

If the Axis had won you wouldn't talk about all these alibis today (like "german pressure" etc.) today...think about it!

grubas:
Exactly,they were under German pressure


Rofl, yeah sure! *rolls eyes*
You are such easy believers if you want to...:)
grubasThreads: 20
Posts: 1,452
Joined: Feb 1, 10
 Pictures: 1
Edited by: grubas  Apr 3, 10, 13:58    #19
Bratwurst Boy:
They had the same reasons to go to war in WWII again like Germany!

Maybe ,but seems like the reasons were not good enough to go to war with PL.And I don't think the Germans were happy knowing that Polish soldiers cross thru Hungary and Romania to get to France.Poles profited from WWII???Now thats something new!How did they profit?
Bratwurst BoyThreads: 11
Posts: 14,563
Joined: Apr 2, 07
 Apr 3, 10, 14:04    #20
grubas:
Maybe ,but seems like the reasons were not good enough to go to war with PL


Well, they didn't lost land to Poland nor did they were ever neighbours!
grubasThreads: 20
Posts: 1,452
Joined: Feb 1, 10
 Pictures: 1
 Apr 3, 10, 14:07    #21
Bratwurst Boy:
nor did they were ever neighbours!

Are you sure about that?
Bratwurst BoyThreads: 11
Posts: 14,563
Joined: Apr 2, 07
Edited by: Bratwurst Boy  Apr 3, 10, 14:35    #22
Are we talking about Austro-Hungary (which Poland was no friend of and one of the partitioners) or cut down, humiliated Hungary which lost most of it's land and is not a neighbour (but seemingly the best friend of Poland) ?
;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Trianon
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,158
Joined: Dec 25, 07
 Apr 3, 10, 14:38    #23
Times have changed, Ironside ;) ;) May I suggest May 2004? :)
grubasThreads: 20
Posts: 1,452
Joined: Feb 1, 10
 Pictures: 1
 Apr 3, 10, 14:40    #24
BB we are talking 1939.
Bratwurst BoyThreads: 11
Posts: 14,563
Joined: Apr 2, 07
 Apr 3, 10, 14:49    #25
grubas:
BB we are talking 1939.


Anyhow my chum Torq already claimed the Hungarians for Poland and even if I can't follow your logic...who am I to dispute it! ;)
jedenThreads: -
Posts: 297
Joined: Nov 30, 09
 Apr 3, 10, 16:37    #26
BB so you deny that

Pole - Bem is a national hungarian hero

that Hungarians helped us in 1863 in resistance.

that Hungarian wanted to send us 20 thousnds cavalry in 1920

that they didn`t want to fight against us, even that they were allie of agressor(Germany)

that they helped Warsaw insurgents in 1944

that Poles send a lot of material help in 1956.

That in 23 March is Polish-Hungarian firendshi day...

If you can`t deny the majority of above statements, You have to agree that there is something in this.
Bratwurst BoyThreads: 11
Posts: 14,563
Joined: Apr 2, 07
 Apr 3, 10, 16:39    #27
I think you suffer romanticism....;) Be happy! ;)
jedenThreads: -
Posts: 297
Joined: Nov 30, 09
Edited by: jeden  Apr 3, 10, 16:48    #28
Probably every east European think similar to me... There is this differance wchich I` ve written about, on the beginig in this thread.

You People of western europe ( I think especially english) have the other kind of view facts, and you traet your allies practically. You have your own interests, we have diffrent values.


You only show ( in what you wrote) that my idea is true!;)
Bratwurst BoyThreads: 11
Posts: 14,563
Joined: Apr 2, 07
Edited by: Bratwurst Boy  Apr 3, 10, 16:58    #29
jeden:
You have your own interests, we have diffrent values.


We don't suffer romanticism if that's what you mean....

jeden:
You only show ( in what you wrote) that my idea is true!;)


I only know for a fact that my Wehrmacht-Grandpa had a close hungarian friend (a count in the hungarian army if I remember it correctly) who invited our family to live on his estate once the war was won.
I don't remember any talks about the fate of the Poles...

Sometimes pragmatism would serve you better, really! ;)
jedenThreads: -
Posts: 297
Joined: Nov 30, 09
 Apr 3, 10, 17:34    #30
We don't suffer romanticism if that's what you mean....

I know, your nation is very pragmatist. Sometimes good for you.

that my Wehrmacht-Grandpa had a close hungarian friend

good for your grandpa, Hungarians as you see are awsome.

Sometimes pragmatism would serve you better, really! ;)

Sometimes are higher values than pragmatism, and raison d'etat, but I agree that pragmatism is not a polish strong point.


page 1 of 2:  1  2  Next »

Home / History of Poland / Unanswered [this forum] | Similar


Similar discussions:

Hitler had Parkinson's - had to accelerate his war plans  Karol Wojtyla, the man who become a pope


Random: w dupie

Only registered and logged-in users may post here. Please log in or register.


62 [Guests - 47 / Members - 15] users on live forums now


Home | Unanswered | Archives | Random | Statistics Time in Poland: 18:19 / May 26

About Us | Contact Us | Rules, Privacy | Poland Advertising

© 2005-12 PolishForums.com