hague1cmaeron: You seem incapable of following you own reasoning, so that is a sure sign, the fact that you need to repeat the question just confirms my analysis, so you don't need to answer the question.
Im fully capable of following my own reasonsings. You are, however, incapable of answering a simple question.
Amathyst: At what..be more specifit?
See above.
frd: but I did and I don't wanna go about which death toll was bigger and which was smaller and whoose cities were razed to the ground a bit more than others that would be kind of sad, to use such arguments... From people I know there's no one who would undermine GB's major role in the WW2 and its loss - although you can't blame some people who are not into historY- I doubt you guys learn anything about polish battles and bombed cities just as we don't learn much about uk - beside the main event which is battle of britain...
Simple fact is people dont give a $hit about Britian and our losses because we dont talk about it or cry about it..We got on with it and re-built and its was our past. FULL STOP. Personally I dont give a **** about Poland anymore..because I have learnt how ungrateful they are about what we did..all they see is we shafted them..they dont see how many English men died. I had a very different view before I came to this board, Im pretty dissapointed they dont see what we lost as a result of entering the war - we were the only country that stood by them from the start.
Ozi Dan: In all seriousness though, what do you think about what I said regarding Teheran? Surely you've come across the implications of this conference in your readings? Do you reckon HMG should have told Poland?
Personally, I would have preferred to have formed an alliance with Russian, Stallin liked Churchill and admired the British forces, therefore there would have been no need for Yalta. And I wouldnt have had to listen to your whining!
|