Barney Who Witold Głębowicz the author?
If he believes in such myths , well , such a myth is created by his ignorance and lack of Polish history knowledge ( the blog`s autor ).
More about Hussars :
Hussars its success largely owed their armour . As it turns out so, hussar saber was reaching the peak of this kind in the world. Wojciech Zablocki-eminent Polish fencer, multiple world champion and Olympic medalist and multi-edged weapons scientist did not hesitate to call it the best saber battle that emerged in human history. Add the falls here, that sword was only a creation of the Polish, formed on the basis of experience gained in the many wars which, unfortunately, the fate of our country is not spared.
An interesting observation of Polish hussars siege of Vienna concluded in writing of Peter Lorraine, "Memoires dun gentilhomme dAlsace Campagne au se reportent Turque." As a military engineer , noted that :
"The splendor of armor and costumes combined with them with a sense of great convenience: many of them are strapped to the saddle at the upper thigh at 4-6 feet long
http://www.husaria.jest.pl/
The above mentioned segment of his writting describes the way the wings were attached ! Do you think that it is very relevant for their superb performance, the way, their wings were attached ?
In my opinion , it was not .
More relevat were their achievements .
Hussars there was almost 3 centuries of their existence . During this time they participated in many battles and skirmishes, that the very mention of them is almost impossible. But to bring more acts of this formation, I have given below a list of battles, in which the hussars took part in only one decade (years 1600-1610). Of course, the Poles won the battles, and are given below only those of them, where the enemy forces were significantly larger than the Polish.
Date , Place , Nb of Polish troops , The opponent and its number, The ratio ( Poish troops : Enemy)
29-IX-1600 Karks 1200 (?) 3000 Swedes [quote] 1 : 2.5 25-Nov-1600 Cutrea de Argesz 1450 (950) Vlachs ok.9000 1: 6 7-I-1601 Cesis (Kies) 700 3000 Swedes 1: 4.3 23-IV-1601 Kokenhausen (Koknese)3000 (about 1000) 4900 Swedes 1: 1.6
25-IX-1604 White Stone (Paid) 2300 (?) 6000 Swedes 1: 2.6 27-IX-1605 Kircholm 3500 (1450) 11,000 Swedes 1: 3.1 4-VII-1610 Klushino 6800 (5550) Russians ok.35000 1 :about 5
[/quote]
Take a look at the ratio of polish troops to the enemy in the battles under Kircholm , Kies and Klushino , that was something , wasn`t it .
|