Quoting: Grzegorz_
You had colonies until mid 20th centuries.
no doubt about it,but,if we had been so busy slaughtering them all do you think they would mostly still be in the Commenwealth.Sorry,as usual most of the killing done was black on black so rascism didnt really come into it.
Quoting: slick77
Why didn't the british government take the above facts into account and decided to pay blacks that compensation?
Im sorry, what ?What compensation? look again at the post you quoted from.. Ill spell it out slowly for you.....T h e B R I T I S H invaded the Sudan in order to STOP the arab blacks enslaving the non arab/muslim blacks. Just who should "we" pay compensation to,the Slave owners? As for SA( south africa in case you didnt get it) considering that SA has been a soverigin state,run by Affricaneers ,since the turn of the last centruy,and the only time rascist laws or seggregation were used was during that time,or prior in Boar states ,what does britain owe exactly to the people of south africa,if anything the Dutch owe them because the boars came from holland.....