|
Not to get off topic and disturb moderators, but yes: State of NY was asking that asbestos be completely removed from WTC 1/2...Former owners, NY Port Authority (although NY State Teachers Fund was also mortgagee) had study done to see what cost of asbestos removal would be...It was quite high...Because of this, along with other financial reasons, Port Authority 'privatized'/sold complex to Larry Silverstein & Westfield Group, shopping mall developers...Silverstein was not going to pay $1-2 billion for asbestos removal....WTC was brought down for political reasons and to destroy evidence of financial wrong doings contained in voluminous records stored in various offices in complex...A big side benefit was simply collection of insurance money...Silverstein insured complex against terrorist attack in early 2001; then, after 911, claimed WTC was hit by 2 attacks, and made double claim for $7 billion...Insurance company based in Switzerland eventually settled with him for about $5.5 billion.
Of course, Silverstein didn't collect all of this and put it in his pocket: he had partners...But say, he kept 2%: that's $100+ million. A post about asbestos turns into a post about the "Jewish conspiracy" within eight replies. Only on this forum...
Asbestos removal jobs for Poles in the UK Never mind removing asbestos, how about removing the racist and illegal description above? This **** killed my dad, so you can **** off, troll.
|