NATO prepares for Nuclear war

I havent said that Serbs were ok I said that we all know what serbs did ... but WWI would start without serbs ....

make up your mind...if you have a problem with not understanding written english,go take out your frustrations somewhere where you atleast know something on the subject,and like i say,check post 2 of the poles in ww2 before you accuse me of being anti polish again....(btw,your making yourself look abit daft,a serb plot caused ww1,fact,just because it MAY have started without it,doesnt negate the fact it did start that way.)

I think you try to be expert in cases in which you don't have any knowledge.

whatever sadek,its all on record nowand I stand by my statements and eagerly await any corrections that come from fact not national chauvanisim.
,lets see ....tell me,who shot Franz ferdinand?
below,a couple of links re the start of ww1

http://www.megaessays.com/essay_search/Gavrilo_Princip.html

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_did_the_Black_Hand_Gang_do

a couple of links of serb warcrimes

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1461693,00.h tml

http://www.guardian.co.uk/yugo/0,,181286,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/yugo/article/0,,2053811,00.html

no doubt links can be found for croat and bosniac warcrimes,but,seeing as its a serb on here playing whiter than white.....

isthatu

Those data that you operates with are data about Serbian sufferings and you here same as your media managed to portrait Serbs as aggressors. Ideology of genocide created by our foes is behind genocide on Serbs. Genocide as political tool is absolutely unknown inside of Serbian minds, society.

On the other side, some Serbs were involved in crimes but those are individual crimes and they are condemn in our society. Such a tragedies follow every war but, to underline- Serbs didn`t start the Civil War. Germany pushed us in bloody war diplomatically and Croatian ustashe and Bosnian Muslims directly on terrain, while Albanians started on Kosovo.

well,thats reasuring crow, as I said in above post,war crimes were commited by ALL sides,and it is good to hear those serbs who commited them are despised in serbia. You have to admit you have a tendancy to blame everyone else and try to deny any serb aggresion though dont you. Glad to see a little balance coming back here. As I said many months ago,Id love to sit and have a proper face t face chat with you in some nice Belgrade bar or cafe ,and who knows,maybe someday I wont feel Im going to be blamed for nato if I do visit serbia.

what you talking about, man?

since i come to this forum i speaks only truth to auditorium. Nor Serbia, nor other Balkan Serbs didn`t start conflict. We were attacked- diplomatically, in propaganda and in open war, from multiple foes. On the scene was ideology of genocide on Serbs. Serbs were erased from their native ground- territory of Krajina, Dalmatia, Slavonia, Istria, from Kosovo, Metohija, from parts of Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Then, in chaos that occurred, yes, some Serbs committed some crimes. Sometimes, those who committed crimes did it as act of revenge on enemy who before that killed some family members to them. Sometimes, Serbs members of mafia and black market criminals, committed crimes (mafia from all sides in conflict was especial problem on terrain, as i said already).

Questions remained- Why so called west supported genocide on Serbs? Why so called west supported ethical cleansing committed on Serbs (more then 1.000.000 Serbs was removed from their homes during this Civil War)? Why NATO even taken part in all that, against Serbs? Why NATO even allayed themselves with mujaheedines against Serbs? Why is so called west against Serbs, really?

Some would say, all that because Serbs are loyal friends/brothers to Russians. But, we know, Serbs are loyal to Poles, too. So, why then?

Because of `drang nach osten`, it becoming clear. Just, who is next?- we should ask

i think i have a comment

It is simply very, very astonishing how the analysts of so called west consider the Russian politicians retarded. They think that Russia is a retarded country, and that G. W. Bush is an example of a brilliant mind.

Sometimes seams to me that they think that by writing crap `analyzes` in which they apparently glorify Putin's policy, and all that packed with very wrong and misleading advices, they would suborn Russia into wrong decisions.

In typical articles of this kind these `analysts write:

`Putin is a good man... `
`Putin is a righteous man....`
`Putin is a man of right decisions...`
`He will not let Russia shamed over Kosovo.... He will react...`

and then come `advices`:

`He will cut the gas to Western Europe`, or
`He will recognize breakaway provinces of Georgia and Azerbaijan` or

All these crap advices ill-wish `advices` usually come with crap statements like:

`just as in Afghanistan, in Iran too Moscow’s interests are in line those of Washington.`, or
`Russia, on the other hand, has natural conflicts built-in with Iran`, or
`The Serbs left the province and NATO moved in... To the Russians, it was the ultimate slap in the face.`, or
`US and EU sided with Muslims` etc...

After all, who gives a **** about Putin. He is just one politician but, so called west want to make Putin even more important then he is important in Russia. So called west hardly can accept that Russian society evolve.

One could at least understand (if not agree with) this simplistic approach if we were facing the world in which the so called West were going well and Russia were going down.

But in fact it is the opposite! Russia's economy is increasing by 7% annually, and at the same time Russia's monetary reserves are the third largest in the world. Russia's influence in the whole world is increasing and Russia becoming respected today in great majority of different countries with different cultures, religions.

On the other side, it is the so called West whose power is fading day by day and even the blind see this! USA have debt of 9000 billion $ and it looks like that they think the only way for them to repay this debt is to start WW3.

But the whole world see them! The whole world now well understand their actions! People are in fear and not from Russia or China, or from Muslims but from possible actions of USA, NATO, EU. Everything is possible in world of disorder, world of THEIR order


So, this `analyst` can stick his advices in his *** (some place behind).

I do believe that new Russia, directed by Pro-Slavic elite shall not betray Iran nor Muslim countries! Russia as all other Slavs, considering Slavic long and continual historical expiriance, should show respect for other civilizations, for their unique path. Also, neither should Russia betray Serbs, in time of their need! Nor Russia, nor other Slavs. That`s the Slavic way.

There is the article which is object of my comment, which after all gave some good remarks, no matter absolutely simplistic approach of author...

Russia's Nuclear Declaration: A Defense, Not An Attack

David Storobin, Esq. - 1/22/2008
http://globalpolitician.com/24045-russia

You know the answer.Some western powers had interest in dissolving Yugoslavia and limit Serbian control in teritorry.

Genocide was not the way to do it tho, it should never be. Milosevic was the problem, not many Serbs

Forget it mate,your obviously a few sarnies short of a picnic.......

Crow points out that the war started when Croatia and Slovenia were recognized by Germany very fast and without consulting other EU members' opinion or having negotiated first with Serbs.This created split and chaos in former Yugoslavia where many nations lived in the same regions.

no mate,crow thinks the sun shines eternall out of serbias arse and everyone else is evil false west....its pathetic. Germany didnt morter bomb markets in Sarajevo...Germany didnt slaughter unarmed men and boys in Srebrenica,he really is pathetic. Like a nazi blaming jews for ww2,a low life loser.