SouthOfDaThames wrote:
WTF has happened to this board????????? Who put everything the wrong way round???
But you've already asked under two different usernames.. Why ask again?
tornado2007 wrote:
It seems admin did not want that the impressions created by avatars add to the impressions created by the text,sth like that.
If that was true, there would be no avatar feature in the first place ::
tornado2007 wrote:
Thanks for cleaning that up for me mate, it still is beyond me what the need for change was, i don't no if Admin has ever really explained its reasons yet
The reason, as always, is improvement.
Wroclaw wrote:
If you read a post without concentrating on the name you are more likely to treat the poster with respect. I think.
Well, currently it's even easier to check the username so that was not the exact reason - the reason was the overall improvement: for both the readers and the poster.
shewolf wrote:
I personally think people are visual and tend to rely on an avatar to recognize the person who is posting. Even if the name is right above the message we still need to see a picture to really know who it is. And in order to do that we have to go all the way across the page now. I think that's why people are complaining. It was just easier when the avatar was right there, on the left side.
Shawn_H wrote:
Because your eye is drawn to the right, away from the post!
When the Avatars were on the left, It Was Fine.
I would completely agree with that IF
all posters had their own (and unique) avatars. However, it would never be the case; currently maybe 20% of registered members have avatars (some are the same) and guest posters obviously cannot have avatars at all. Your reply suggests you only relied on avatars in posts - but what when the poster had no avatar, wasn't it confusing or distracting? Now there's only one and non-distracting way that applies to all posters -- to check the username. It couldn't be easier.
Admin