Wow, i've never been witness to so much on-line pillow talk as matt and rocky have been afftectionately exchanging*shudders*
matthias wrote:
You did say that he contradicted himself......
congratulations on your astute command of the obvious.
Here are some of those contradictions again:
RockyMason wrote:
No large scale conspiracy could exist for that long some1 would find out and then they would b lynched!
RockyMason wrote:
IT is possible there is a large scale conspiracy! Its very very unlikely though!
RockyMason wrote:
There are very few truly shady politicians! Most are halfway decent despite lying or misleading people even the influential ones.
RockyMason wrote:
Damn str8 there r lobbyists with several million dollars to grease things up that are more influential than a bunch of senators! $ and schmoozing runs the show in politics! Its not about wats right or wrong! Its about who u like and who likes u and how much they like u$$$$$$$.
RockyMason wrote:
Politicians have always been a bit sleezy and had some pretty flexible morals and they always will!
So what was your point?
matthias wrote:
who started the insults...
That wasn't an insult. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt by writing you ARE intentionally missing all the pertinent points because I don't believe you really are that stupid. But as you've taken it as an insult (your problem son, not mine) then you may have proven me wrong in giving you that benefit- congrats.
matthias wrote:
It's your paranioa that causes you to jump to conclusions that no one has even made...
I gave you an award and you take it as an insult- paranoid, aren't you? And, at the risk of stealing your thunder and pointing out the obvious: I merely indicated how his analogies were contradictory.
Foreigner4 wrote:
Rocky,
As stated before, if I had been unsure before reading your posts, then, the fact that they do contradict one another so blatantly would have been reason to become more sure your ealier assertions had, in fact, been false.
Now if you can't figure out what exactly that means then you can ask for an explanation. I don't want to insult anyone and point out the obvious though.
matthias wrote:
like I said before get off your high horse because your the biggest crook...
Are you actually really like that? I mean do you just fly off the handle and make baseless remarks when off line? I pity anyone that has to put up with your attempts at intellect. It's sad you're not even able to recognize how futile your attempts at discourse really are. This isn't an insult mind you, it really is a pity.
Like a couple of two-bit lawyers, you've both taken a stance and refuse to admit you're both wrong even when it is clearly visible that you've either contradicted yourself so blatantly(mason dude) that you undid your own assertions from the outset, or simply misread and misunderstood everything you've tried to argue so badly(mat boy) that it's almost comical. You maintain an emphatic and insulting position with those who disagree with your beliefs, not based on sound reasoning but because that's really the best you can do.
Again I never stated anything contradictory to your orginal assertions rocky. YOU DID!
Now i'll respond to either of you when you post something of value, but i am skeptical.