SeanBM Threads: 41 / Posts: 7,430
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Edited by: SeanBM Mar 7, 2010, 05:57pm #125
I don't believe that Africa posed a threat at all.
Agreed, but you did accuse America of using it as a weapon to kill Africans.
So I think you are going back on what you clearly stated earlier:
the US has an antidote but is withholding it. They want Africans to die out of concerns for population control.
Africa seemed to be a sitting duck and ripe for the pickings. India and China at least had some chance to combat it.
Putting a seemly unknown (and therefore undetectable) virus like HIV in any country, back then, would have tremendous consequentness and there would have been nothing that India or China could have done.
I don't believe in using AIDS as a political tool, what's so hard to understand about that?
But you do believe it is used and invented by America to kill Africans. I do not say you condone it, I say that it is a very ineffective weapon that has killed millions of Americans.
I would like to add here that I have come across the concept, in a fictional South African film, of AIDs being injected into the black population by white dentists who wanted to kill the blacks.
BUT that is a far cry from saying that America is responsible for 25 million HIV deaths, millions of their very own people using HIV as an extremely inefficient "weapon" in some insane attempt of controlling population.
AIDS wasn't discovered til 1984 by Gallo, the spread was visible before then.
Yes, it as discovered in 1984 (Orwell is turning in his grave)
But you are jumping to an incorrect understanding, that it was spreading before it was discovered is not an indication of anything except that it existed.
How? Because they say that whole blood inoculations caused AIDS. It's against the Hippocratic Oath to kill as prevention of harm is golden. If those inoculations were being administered in the 60's, how could it be that no tissue samples showed it? Selective sampling against probability?
Here again you are saying that Americans knowingly killed their own people.
You are playing join the dots were there aren't any, will give another reason, Aids spread, the people who did not have it before contracted it.
There was less of a threat in the 60s "free love" because AIDs was unknown and it spread like the virus it is.
China had a one-child policy in place and, even then, daughters were often drowned so they were left without kids. Thailand and Africa were/are fertile breeding grounds and that's what I wanted to say.
People al over the world from all walks of life have contracted the AIDs virus, less educated people are unaware of prevention.
This isn't a gun, this is circulating sth within a community that mutates and, according to some authorities, cannot be cured.
Again, this is not area specific or within any community, it is global.
Questions answered, I hope
I will put it this way, what is the motive for Americans:
a). Inventing the disease as a weapon?
b). releasing such an incredibly inefficient "Weapon" in to the populous killing thier own people as well as 25 million others?
c) Having a vaccine and still letting millions die, including their very own people?
just an experiment went wrong.
That is NOT what you said before. You said it was a American manufactured disease to kill of Africans and they have a cure but are hiding it from everyone.
I made the point that there would be swine flu or sth similar
You are a genius, will it ever rain again?
Of course there will be new or mutations of viruses that will kill millions of people again, it has happened all throughout our history, smallpox, Tuberculosis, Malaria, Measles, Hepatitus B, Tetanus etc... it is not a question of "will
it happen again", it is a question of "when
it will happen again".
It was a golden chance for the pharmaceutical companies to profit by creating new business.
I do agree, perhaps for different reasons but some
multinational pharmaceutical companies have no moral fibre and just go for profit.
I know that they are a business and must make profit but there should be a better ethics code, perhaps looking at numbers dying rather than just their stock shares increasing.
And as we all know there is not much profit in cure but huge profit in making people dependant.
There are books in Poland, you know? ;) ;) ;) Oh, the internet too. Ain't that amazing? ;) ;) Oh, and friends with people in high places, how about that? ;) ;)
I have to meet you to prove you are in fact human and not an artificial intelligent life-form that gains all his knowledge from youtube and other obscure websites.
Um, are you joking Seanny? The female anopheles mosquito is the principal carrier of malaria.
You are obsessed with killing Americans. I don't think that they unleashed it on their populace so directly
yet another contradiction:
What I'm saying as an undeniable fact is that there were human guinea pigs used in NYC
NYC, that's in the U.S, right? not central Africa? perhaps the map of the world has changed since last I looked at it.
You are obsessed with killing Americans.
My obsession is that you are blaming America for killing 25 million people, probably the most people anyone has ever killed. And killing millions of their own people while they have a vaccine.
And that is why it is a nutty conspiracy.
I dont doubt for a minute that there are terrible viruses lurking in US labs ( and those in the EU too ) but as viruses go - HIV1 and 2 are frail retroviruses.
If you wanted to develop a population killing virus there are a whole lot out there already which would be a lot more effective than HIV.
What do you say to Boyd Grave's claim that a cure has been available since 1997? It is patented and on record.
I'd put it up there with A claim by Gambian President Yahya Jammeh that he can cure Aids