Seanus: Nomad, he is a dangerous man who seeks to present the downright immoral as somehow plausible. He doesn't want peace in the world. He had better put a viable 2-state solution together.
evidences for that, for him being a dangerous? any of his words that shows that? there are people who don't want peace, there are people who are against them even though they may not know how to do peace.. at most, Obama can be in second category..
ps: by the way, among people who don't want peace are not only killers, murderers, etc, but also victims, kids hurt, etc as well.
sascha: Are you living in lala-land? The 40 year concession of oil from Lybia expired and Gaddafi did not want to give the us huge amounts of oil rather to the brics countries. You think o went to Lybia because of rebellion? Man, your brain believes in Santa Claus. Your comments are blablabla... O in PL checking on the status of the helping troops maybe?
I say it again.. it is not Obama who is aggressive to Libya, but, Brits (France as well, but, theirs is against Brits' plan, I see things in Libya like that.) Obama and his sponsors are not in oil and military industries. So, you are talking not logical things.
|