Tran Anh wrote: The only but great disadvantage of 'Small' (i will clarify it below) countries is when someone simply decide to swallow them and quickly accomplish the deed (the scenario is very likely if "each only sticks to its own business''), thus rendering all development a waste of time.
I don't want to change boundaries of the countries. Regionalism means simply that regions of countries would have almost of competences except foreign and defense policy. So this would change nothing, defensive ability would be the same and maybe even better because simplest system would be more efficient.
Tran Anh wrote: However if you meant that a certain country can adopt the stance and model of Switzerland to be free, prosperous and safely forget the rest of the world, then you are kinda utopian now (in a worst sense). The Swiss were only spared in the 20th century thanks to its neighbour (we know who) was clever enough to realise its utter uselessness other than being a 'temporary' docile safe for stolen money (there is no doubt that had Hitler fulfilled his goal, he would have finished off "Helvetia" as old Bonaparte so smoothly did centuries before). And in later time did it lie diffirently from its current location (say, in Balcan or Middle East), the oh-so-famous model would either not exist or be quickly consumed.
Times are changing, the Germans are not Nazis anymore and maybe except meaningless Balkans people are sick and tired of wars. This could be proper time to decentralize European countries but unfortunately Brussels bureaucrats stealing our freedoms, introducing their version of socialism went in opposite direction.
Tran Anh wrote: -The establishment of a world government in its true sense is neccesary to cleanse that atmosphere, bringing prosperity and equality to all particating nations and accordingly to every citizen. Thanks to that, it will be the thing all governments dream to be: Sustainable.
This is pure utopia... This was proofed so many times that socialism doesn't works, bring only disaster instead planned prosperity. You need to understand that when distance between people and administration is small, then the latter is afraid. While when distance between people and administration is huge then people are doomed because the latter don't care want they want. I advice you to study some practical economics instead pushing idealistic globalist ideology.
|
