PolishForums.com
POLAND . The Unofficial Guide
Unanswered | Archives
Culture and Customs of Poland Witamy, Guest | PF Members | Gold Members

Polish Forums / News, Politics /

A Polish scientist (allegedly) caused AIDS


page 4 of 5:  « Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next »

beelzebubThreads: -
Posts: 515
Joined: Feb 16, 10
Edited by: beelzebub  Mar 7, 10, 01:55    #91
I have no problem with anyone's comment in this thread about the US. There is no perceived slight against my nation so I cannot figure out how you think I am not taking criticism when I don't see any? Explain to me clearly what other example of me not being able to "take" comments about the USA exist here?

My comment that I found it ridiculous that the US govt (or anyone obviously) would create HIV is the only one I see that you could even twist into that and you have repeatedly said that's not it. Will you rise to the challenge or just post another smug comment?

SeanBMThreads: 41
Posts: 8,647
Joined: Mar 10, 08
Edited by: SeanBM  Mar 7, 10, 01:56    #92
Seanus:
Boyd Graves even spells out what the patent is for the cure to AIDS.

I could imagine a conspiracy that indicates that pharmaceuticals do not want a cure because it is more profitable to make people dependant on their drugs but having a cure and wanting to kill people in certain areas, even though it is world wide, it doesn't make sense Seanus.

beelzebub:
Explain to me clearly what other example of me not being able to "take" comments about the USA exist here?

No :)

i have wasted too much time on you already and you are just going to insult me again, say that I should admit I am wrong again, tell me that AIDs was not man made again etc...
In fact your unwillingness to just stop is just more proof that you can dish it out but can't take it hahahaha

read this post again, it is all in there, I am not arsed typing it all again.
_TRUTH_Threads: 1
Posts: 6
Joined: Mar 6, 10
 Mar 7, 10, 01:58    #93
this thread is not about the USA or Poland or US citizens or Polish citizens.

Stop you preschool childish behavior.
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
Edited by: Seanus  Mar 7, 10, 01:59    #94
Well, he even gives you the url where you can access and research the patent itself. In 1974, there was a population control presentation by Kissinger. He was talking in Bucharest. You'll be stunned by what he says, I dare you to check it out.

TRUTH, Koprowski knew little about sheep/cow hybrids and the international community vindicated him.
_TRUTH_Threads: 1
Posts: 6
Joined: Mar 6, 10
Edited by: _TRUTH_  Mar 7, 10, 02:01    #95
I have checked it out. But by 1974 HIV was on the verge of becoming an epidemic.
convexThreads: 47
Posts: 7,189
Joined: Nov 25, 09
Pictures: 2
 Mar 7, 10, 02:03    #96
_TRUTH_:
this thread is not about the USA or Poland or US citizens or Polish citizens.

"A Polish scientist caused AIDS"

.... What is it about?
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
 Mar 7, 10, 02:06    #97
TRUTH, please tell me about Dr MacArthur. This should let me know what you know or don't. Thanks!
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
 Mar 7, 10, 02:09    #98
Being a dismisser is one thing. Proving your case is another. Beel, you don't know a darn thing about your government. What a denier!
SeanBMThreads: 41
Posts: 8,647
Joined: Mar 10, 08
Edited by: SeanBM  Mar 7, 10, 02:13    #99
By the way Seanus, I have heard of this conspiracy before, from some African leader (I think I can't remember exactly) but it really makes no sense.

Every country in the world is effected by AIDs, why would anyone want to kill their own people. It can't be a weapon because it is indiscriminate.

beelzebub:
Which is it?

Read the post, you completely change your stance from slagging off Poland because someone has made the claim that they created AIDs. And you continue to slag Poland off until the U.S. is mentioned and you change your stance to a defensive one. I have quoted you chronologically and you have been unwilling to see it but profess that I am not answering you. And you go on and on like a broken record, other people can see it, you can't, get it now? I doubt it.
MatowyThreads: 1
Posts: 519
Joined: Jul 4, 09
 Mar 7, 10, 02:21    #100
beelzebub:
I meant MY comment that I found it ludicrous that the US would create HIV.

It's much less ludicrous than other things the U.S government spends money on. Some of the projects they pour money into for "defense" would make you laugh at the absurdity of it. Creating a virus for population control? That would be one of the milder projects.
MatowyThreads: 1
Posts: 519
Joined: Jul 4, 09
 Mar 7, 10, 02:31    #101
beelzebub:
Oh surprise surprise matowy is here to disagree with me....

Not really. I gain nothing from disagreeing with you. I already pointed out your senseless aggression, unwillingness to learn from your mistakes, inability to take criticism without acting like a child, and your now infamous inferiority complex. I assume that the fact that at least 3 others have pointed this out to you on various threads has allowed it penetrate your fantasies about yourself, now all that we need to do is wait patiently for these new revelations to sink in. Despite your accusations, I am far too lazy to hold a grudge, and my post remains solely about the fact that the U.S dipping into viral weaponry would be one of the most laid-back projects it has undertaken in its "defense" budget, and thus nowhere near the realms of "ludicrous".
MatowyThreads: 1
Posts: 519
Joined: Jul 4, 09
 Mar 7, 10, 02:36    #102
beelzebub:
Matowy ou left out the part where you proved yourself a liar. You said you did not claim to be superior to anyone then I posted a quote where you said exactly what. Didn't hear from you after that no surprise :)

Probably because I didn't re-visit the thread. I'm proud of you for using evidence for once, though, even if it was for some stereotypically childish endeavour.
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
 Mar 7, 10, 02:38    #103
I'm not a wild conspiracy nut. For example, despite the overwhelming evidence pointing towards manufacturing, the question still remains. How did the AIDS virus spread so widely? Yes, it can be transmitted in different ways but still. I don't think you'd make the numbers of currently affected people by simply allowing people to travel freely and transmit it from person to person. To get near those figures, you'd have to 'drop it' into populations and that is no easy task on a large scale.
grethomoryThreads: 2
Posts: 212
Joined: Mar 19, 08
 Mar 7, 10, 04:41    #104
There are so many theories of how HIV got here. I've read articles that have said it is believed to have been here as far back as the 30's or 40's, but with the way the virus mutates itself it became stronger and able to replicate itself better. I saw something on PBS about it and it stated that once a person gets on HIV medicine they can never stop because the virus gets smart enough to understand the medicine and if the patient starts back to taking the medicine then it will be in effective. If you Goggle on the web you will get all kinds of theories...and they are about as effective as who really killed JFK.
MediaWatchThreads: 29
Posts: 1,264
Joined: Aug 30, 08
 Mar 7, 10, 06:56    #105
beelzebub:
You have repeatedly said I am ripping on Poland

Yes that's a correct observation by this other guy.

Everyone here is observing that you are ripping into Poland BECAUSE YOU ARE.

You never miss a chance to bash the Polish people.

You have some sick psycopathic hateful obsession with Polish people while coming across as some all knowing egomaniac.

Why in the world did you CHOOSE to live in Poland and for a LONG TIME as you say if the Polish people are so annoying to you and have so many negative qualities according to you?

You have a clear anti-Polish Vendetta and everyone here can see it.

If people have criticisms for Poland, that's one thing. But you are beyond that. All you do is look to find fault with Polish people.

As for your ridiculous notion that Poles don't accept criticism, half of the comments on these topics have been critical of Poles WITHOUT the Poles defending themselves, so what are you talking about?

To give an idea of how Poles have criticized themselves and taken blame, just about every Polish president has "apologized for Poland's anti-semitism" despite the fact most Jews CHOSE to LIVE In Poland for ONE THOUSAND YEARS because Poland gave Jews opportunities to LIVE and HAVE FAMILIES when all other countries were kicking them out.

The great rabbi Moses Isserles said "If it were not for Poland, the existence of the tribe of Israel would have been unbearable". But despite all that Poland has done for Jews, Poland had to apologize for its "historic anti-semitism" to powerful Leftist Jewish groups.
beelzebubThreads: -
Posts: 515
Joined: Feb 16, 10
Edited by: beelzebub  Mar 7, 10, 07:01    #106
MediaWatch:
Yes that's a correct observation by this other guy.

Dude you took HALF of my statement and totally out of the context of this argument. You can't just slice out a few words and then use them however you want. Of course you are all going to agree you are all the same overly sensitive Poles who can't accept any criticism without attacking.

You must have missed the posts I made praising Polish doctors or ripping on US pop culture. After all I never post ANYTHING but Polish hate according to you.

But I forgot...You are the guy with the Nazi/NBC obsession who cuts and pastes his Hitler conspiracy theory over and over and over.....so do you REALLY think you rate saying something to me about it?
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
 Mar 7, 10, 10:59    #107
Specifically addressing the OP's contentions, I encourage him to read up on what the Wistar Institute did in 2000 to the Chat vaccine. In a nutshell, they tested the vaccine for its properties and cleared it of any involvement with AIDS/HIV.

As for the spreading of AIDS, 3 key factors played their part. Travel, the blood industry and drug use. However, these 3 alone perhaps aren't enough for the pandemic that we are witnessing today.
SeanBMThreads: 41
Posts: 8,647
Joined: Mar 10, 08
Edited by: SeanBM  Mar 7, 10, 11:44    #108
Seanus:
I'm not a wild conspiracy nut. For example, despite the overwhelming evidence pointing towards manufacturing, the question still remains. How did the AIDS virus spread so widely? Yes, it can be transmitted in different ways but still. I don't think you'd make the numbers of currently affected people by simply allowing people to travel freely and transmit it from person to person. To get near those figures, you'd have to 'drop it' into populations and that is no easy task on a large scale.

I think you are a conspiracy nut.

For example you believe that 9/11 was carried out by the American government, that Americans killed their own people.
Now you believe that the American government invented AIDs, have a cure and in a dastardly plan to kill off Africans, set this "weapon" that can take many years to kill among the populous, in effect killing the American people again.

It is thought that more than one million people are living with HIV in the USA and that more than half a million have died after developing AIDS.

U.S. Statistics


Are you going to debate your stance Seanus or just throw another youtube video at me and tell me that you know more but you are unwilling or able to talk about it?


Malaria kills many more people than AIDs, did they invent that too?
Czarnkow1940Threads: 11
Posts: 167
Joined: Mar 5, 10
 Mar 7, 10, 11:50    #109
SeanBM:
For example you believe that 9/11 was carried out by the American government, that Americans killed their own people.

Thats more plausible then a Polish scientist causing AIDS
SeanBMThreads: 41
Posts: 8,647
Joined: Mar 10, 08
Edited by: SeanBM  Mar 7, 10, 11:58    #110
Czarnkow1940:
Thats more plausible then a Polish scientist causing AIDS


The Loch ness is more plausible than a Pole manufacturing AIDs.

On the first page of this thread there is irrefutable evidence that this is not true.

I think all this has a slightly deeper meaning than just beating up Poles like Beelzabub does.

People have learned not to trust the media and governments because they are full of bull but in doing so they believe anything, any conspiracy, any half baked notion and when it is irrefutably denounced it just strengthens their conspiracy theories.
It is in essence a no-win situation because no matter how much proof or logic is used, it can and probably will be used as a ''cover up''.
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
 Mar 7, 10, 12:13    #111
Seanny, what is it that you think I believe in relation to Koprowski and AIDS? That's the enquiry at hand.

Everyone has their pet theories and love to cling to them. I'm just giving food for thought here. You haven't even mentioned Boyd Graves once so how am I expected to discuss anything with you? He is the one that produced the flowchart through Freedom of Information. Everything else he got from public record. You went to bed just after 2.30 and I added another post stating exactly why I wasn't a wild conspiracy nut. I subsequently stated that it wasn't likely that the culmination of 3 factors (travel, the blood industry and widespread drug use) led to AIDS on the scale that we are currently witnessing it. What I am saying is that there is cogent/credible evidence, though not incontrovertible in a legalistic sense, to suggest that it was a manufactured virus.
SeanBMThreads: 41
Posts: 8,647
Joined: Mar 10, 08
Edited by: SeanBM  Mar 7, 10, 12:38    #112
Seanus:
what is it that you think I believe in relation to Koprowski and AIDS? That's the enquiry at hand.

Why are you asking me? you are avoiding the issue.
I have stated exactly what I think, why do you now push some mystical bull on me? as if i know what you think.

Seanus:
Everyone has their pet theories and love to cling to them. I'm just giving food for thought here.

So why do your theories involve Americans killing themselves?

Seanus:
You haven't even mentioned Boyd Graves once so how am I expected to discuss anything with you?

You have not answered one of my questions, so why bother discussing details when your whole argument is fundamentally flawed?

Seanus:
I added another post stating exactly why I wasn't a wild conspiracy nut.

I think you are a conspiracy nut. So what's your point?

Seanus:
What I am saying is that there is cogent/credible evidence, though not incontrovertible in a legalistic sense, to suggest that it was a manufactured virus.

That is not all you are saying though, is it?

This is a previous quote that you are not suggesting but offering as fact:
Seanus:
the US has an antidote but is withholding it. They want Africans to die out of concerns for population control.

So Americans are so devious that they invent HIV as a "weapon" but they didn't think it would effect them? They are killing their own people but have a vaccine? This is totally illogical.

Seanus:
What I am saying is that there is cogent/credible evidence, though not incontrovertible in a legalistic sense, to suggest that it was a manufactured virus.

This little paradox of yours sums it up for me:
Seanus:
I deal in conspiracy fact.


SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
 Mar 7, 10, 12:56    #113
No, your allegation is wholly unclear. I am saying that Koprowski worked with the polio vaccine but there have been several cogent refutations that he inadvertently created part of the simian virus. Hooper himself doubted his own work. I alluded to a study in 2000 done in Philadelphia (Wistar Institute). I also said before that that the wider scientific community rejected the contention that he designed it. There are several pet theories and this one holds little weight. Clear enough?? Or did you think I said sth else?

Because I understand hegemony and geopolitics much better than you do, no offence! There are countless instances of cabals and nefarious elements seeking to further agendas. You just choose not to see them.

I answered your question about the Illuminati and the one before. Please look above. I can hardly edit now. It's all there.

On quite a few occasions, I don't support their contentions. It's about gauging what is plausible and what isn't. I don't believe much of what conspiracy theorists write. I just don't feel that we should be led off of certain trails by those who can conceal them. The patent is even there, Seanny, there's nothing conspiratorial about that. They had a program in 1971 of which they granted $10 million. They even wanted a weapon ready, it's all in the links.

On good sources, I have info that they have a cure and corroborating that is the FACT that Boyd Graves himself had AIDS and was cured. Needless to say, that peaked his curiosity and he did his homework. The patent is in public libraries, Seanny, he even gave a step-by-step guide to accessing that content.

Why the talk of Americans? I'm talking about a governmental department and certain individuals who are not necessarily Americans.

'I deal in conspiracy fact' was directly taken from Mike Ruppert, a former CIA guy who has 25 years exp that, sorry, you don't have. His presentations are available on Youtube (where else?) ;) ;) I know the context in which he said it which is why it was fit for use above.
SeanBMThreads: 41
Posts: 8,647
Joined: Mar 10, 08
Edited by: SeanBM  Mar 7, 10, 13:22    #114
Seanus:
Clear enough?? Or did you think I said sth else?

You said :
Seanus:
the US has an antidote but is withholding it. They want Africans to die out of concerns for population control.

or are you trying to go back on what you said?



Seanus:
Because I understand hegemony and geopolitics much better than you do, no offence! There are countless instances of cabals and nefarious elements seeking to further agendas. You just choose not to see them.

This argument is really bad, you think you know more than me so I should just except your opinion as fact, Seanus that is BS.

Seanus:
The patent is even there, Seanny, there's nothing conspiratorial about that. They had a program in 1971 of which they granted $10 million. They even wanted a weapon ready, it's all in the links.

Here you go again calling AIDs a "weapon".
Your logic is fundamentally flawed, you are saying that Americans have a vaccine and are killing their own people.
This is the most indiscriminate and therefore useless weapon ever made.

Seanus:
Why the talk of Americans?

YOU SAID:
Seanus:
He even corroborated what I was told, that the US has an antidote but is withholding it. They want Africans to die out of concerns for population control.

Seanus:
'I deal in conspiracy fact' was directly taken from Mike Ruppert, a former CIA guy who has 25 years exp that, sorry, you don't have. His presentations are available on Youtube (where else?) ;) ;) I know the context in which he said it which is why it was fit for use above.

Again with the "I know something you don't know" argument.

You are a conspiracy nut, your logic is flawed, you continue to not answer my questions and instead revert to being a 'know it all' and talking to me as if I am an upstart for even questioning your nutty theory.

Seanus:
I answered your question about the Illuminati and the one before. Please look above. I can hardly edit now. It's all there.

My questions are:

Am I understanding you correctly, The two most populated countries in the world are India and China but it is Africa that the U.S. want to kill off for population control?

Because the countries in Africa are such a threat?

So this AIDs doctor has the antidote and they made this disease, that people can live with now with the proper medication, in affect making it not the best of weapons and they want to kill off Africans, even though China and India are the most populated countries in the world.

You still have not clearly said what the the theory is, the U.S. invented AIDs to keep the population of Africa in check, is that the whole point or did I miss something?

Seanus:
"World-Wide scourge and black-death type plague in certain geographical areas of the world."'.

You see it is this, as well as many more things that fail in your theory.
"Certain geographical areas" but it is world wide.

Every country in the world is effected by AIDs, why would anyone want to kill their own people. It can't be a weapon because it is indiscriminate.

For example you believe that 9/11 was carried out by the American government, that Americans killed their own people.
Now you believe that the American government invented AIDs, have a cure and in a dastardly plan to kill off Africans, set this "weapon" that can take many years to kill among the populous, in effect killing the American people again.
It is thought that more than one million people are living with HIV in the USA and that more than half a million have died after developing AIDS.

U.S. Statistics

Malaria kills many more people than AIDs, did they invent that too?

So why do your theories involve Americans killing themselves?

So Americans are so devious that they invent HIV as a "weapon" but they didn't think it would effect them? They are killing their own people but have a vaccine? This is totally illogical.
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
 Mar 7, 10, 14:11    #115
Seanny, the whole first paragraph about my retort above concerned Koprowski and the rebuttals against his involvement, true? That is a very separate theory from the one about the manufacturing in Fort Detrick, but ok, I'll answer your question. Listen this time, please. It is on public record that an antitode has been available for 13 years now. It goes under 2 names and is manufactured by an Israeli. Clear??

No, those words are sound as they spell out what I perceive to be the position.

Yet you care not to refute it. I've given you the link yet you won't even take the time to hear the man out and test the validity of his claim. It seems like your mind has already been made up so what's the point?

I've answered your questions. If you feel I haven't, please put them to me again as I feel that I have.

Seanny, do you attribute the high incidence of AIDS in Africa solely to sexual promiscuity? Please explain why the group most likely to be in contact with the AIDS virus, namely pygmies, show almost no incidence of AIDS. It is probable that green monkeys were subjected to testing as the CIA had a testing ground in Uganda, probably elsewhere too. In fact, yes, fact, Gallo's cohorts acknowledged that it was a laboratory contaminant (Essex and Kanki).

Prostitution alone cannot explain the high incidence of AIDS but look at Thailand and many African countries. They have major industries and that's why the incidence is as it is.

I think racism played a major part, yes. Some 330,000 people were left to die because treatments weren't administered. It's a tough balance to strike between pharmaceutical treatments and population control.

AIDS is a huge problem in China and India too. There has been a spread for many reasons, well beyond the forecasts of experts.

Just like the British government didn't envisage such a huge influx of foreigners, those people didn't envisage how AIDS would spread like wildfire. Well, not on that scale anyway. People travel, Seanny, blood is sold and drugs are used. Just look at heroin sales around the world.

Americans encapsulates all Americans and I already explained who was behind it. Such experts know their stuff and working for a biowarfare program must tell you sth. MacArthur and Gallo knew what they were up to.
SeanBMThreads: 41
Posts: 8,647
Joined: Mar 10, 08
Edited by: SeanBM  Mar 7, 10, 14:31    #116
Seanus:
I've answered your questions. If you feel I haven't, please put them to me again as I feel that I have.

Not one.

My questions are all just a few post above this one, here.

SeanBM:
[/quote]

[quote=Seanus]Seanny, do you attribute the high incidence of AIDS in Africa solely to sexual promiscuity?

Not at all, you are putting words in to my mouth and making ridiculous assumptions.

You have really no idea how damaging your nutty conspiracy theories are in the real world.
There are many uneducated (and some even educated people) in Africa who think that AIDs is a white man's hoax and in the most extreme cases believe that having sex with a virgin can cure it.
That your nutty theory is true and white man can not be trusted because we are tryiing to kill Africans off.
The Difficult Struggle Against AIDS in Africa

Mbeki has received worldwide criticism for his HIV/AIDS stance. His questioning of the link between HIV/AIDS and poverty and the AIDS rate in Africa was a challenge to the viral theory of AIDS. His fate was not helped by Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang and the overhaul of the pharmaceutical industry in South Africa. The delay in distributing antiretroviral drugs is attributed to the ban he placed on their use in public state hospitals, and is also linked to the estimated deaths of some hundreds of thousands. Thabo Mbeki has also been criticized for responding on negative comments made about governance by accusing them of racism.

Wiki
You obviously have not thought about your theory logically and in the real world, that is probably why you continue to avoid my direct questions.

Seanus:
Please explain why the group most likely to be in contact with the AIDS virus, namely pygmies, show almost no incidence of AIDS.

Because the Americans want to kill their own people? because America wants to kill Africans and used pygmies as guinea pygmies for their scientific research all the while letting millions of their own people die?

Seanus:
Prostitution alone cannot explain the high incidence of AIDS but look at Thailand and many African countries. They have major industries and that's why the incidence is as it is.

What is Thailand know for Sean, have you ever been?
Are you saying that prostitution is the only way to contract AIDs???

Seanus:
I think racism played a major part, yes. Some 330,000 people were left to die because treatments weren't administered. It's a tough balance to strike between pharmaceutical treatments and population control.

Nutty theory more like, a tough balance? between killing millions of Americans and population control, all the while America is flooded with illegal immigrants from the South and have a cure no doubt???
Your logic is flawed.

Seanus:
AIDS is a huge problem in China and India too. There has been a spread for many reasons, well beyond the forecasts of experts.

Americans are killing Americans. And you say that they want population control so they are killing Africans, that's a nutty theory.

Seanus:
those people didn't envisage how AIDS would spread like wildfire. Well, not on that scale anyway.

"Those people" :) Yes they are brilliantly clever and incredibly stupid all at the same time.
Their ineffective "weapon" backfired.
This is the problem with conspiracy nuts, the more facts to counter the theory, the deeper the conspiracy goes.
I know there is no real point in discussing this issue because you are not willing to see the flawed logic and answer my direct questions, in a direct manner.

Seanus:
Such experts know their stuff and working for a biowarfare program must tell you sth.

Yes, and AIDs is the best they could come up with as a "weapon" for population growth?
Why not just say that the Americans spread malaria, then they would not be killing so many of their own people and would kill of Indians, African etc... or is that a bit to logical to be a conspiracy theory?
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
Edited by: Seanus  Mar 7, 10, 14:59    #117
OK, you will put "not one" at me again, that's fine. I'll interpret that as a sign of weakly-framed questions.

I don't believe that having sex with a virgin can cure it at all, I simply don't buy into that. Yes, those notions are damaging but I have no direct involvement in them whatsoever. I'd rather live and let live without the perceived need for any BS like population control or devious contamination.

There were multiple experiments conducted and doesn't it strike you as odd that AIDS occurred simultaneously in NYC and Africa? Please explain to me why NO tissue samples taken from Africans in the early 1970's showed the HIV virus yet there was a catalysing event later in the decade.

What I do find surprising, though, is that the WHO's inoculation programs started in 1960 and continued up to 1977. This tends to undermine the case of the conspiracy theorists.

If we are to accept the claim that it was genetically engineered in 1974, that didn't give them much time but the tissue sample testing stopped around then. From the mid 70's onwards, it was employed. The best book on the issue is by Dr William Campbell Douglass, 'Who Murdered Africa?'.

Dr Alan Cantwell is also another leading authority. His conclusions are well thought out.

As for the flowchart, it was approved by the eminent microbiologist, Dr Garth Nicolson. Go and ask a microbiologist, Seanny, they'll confirm that.

"Prostitution alone cannot explain the high incidence of AIDS", is a direct quote from what I said. You clearly weren't focussing when you asked "Are you saying that prostitution is the only way to contract the AIDs???". 2 or 3 times above I have referred to sex tourism, the blood industry and the drug trade. True or not? Given that HIV is a rapidly mutating and virulent virus, I wouldn't say otherwise. Transmission is from more than one source, clear??

I see the same words coming from you, Seanny, but little structured argument. I don't know why so many Mexicans are allowed into the US but I guess cheap labour plays a major part. That's another discussion. Yes, it's a tough balance. You really seem blind to how things work outside conventional perspectives. Sorry to say it but it's glaringly obvious from reading your posts. Population control and gross pharmaceutical profits are just realities, you can't deny them.

Are you even remotely aware of how America has been operating behind closed doors? Read the Doctrine of Shock about torture and mind cleansing, read the authors above on AIDS, question who profits from war etc etc. There's nothing nutty about it, it's happening as we type.

Malaria wouldn't be a good sell to questioning minds as they'd see right through it. It's from the anopheles (female) mosquito and we both know that.

So, to be straight Seanny, how do you think AIDS came about? From a green monkey? LOL

Oh, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oajGX9PTh0, this is quite clear
TymoteuszThreads: 7
Posts: 694
Joined: Jul 25, 09
 Mar 7, 10, 15:05    #118
lukaszpoznanski:
Name: _TRUTH_
Threads: 1
Posts: 1
Subject: A Polish scientist caused AIDS

Profile of a Troll.

Correction, Gay troll.
asikThreads: 2
Posts: 547
Joined: Feb 17, 09
 Mar 7, 10, 15:11    #119
_TRUTH_:
A Polish scientist caused AIDS

Why moderators are not deleting such a post?????? Do you sponsor here the people who are accusing others like this poster, named Truth. Truth doesn't even realise she can be made responsible for the whole accusation!
It's not hard to find out your Identification Computer..Ms Truth
SeanusThreads: 22
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Dec 25, 07
 Mar 7, 10, 15:26    #120
This is the internet, asik, not an international conference indicting Koprowski. I have outlined several reasons above as to why he wasn't involved. TRUTH was just citing a book but medical evidence can safely refute the averments. Exaggeration is not called for, calm and educated minds are.

page 4 of 5:  « Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next »

Home / News, Politics / Unanswered [this forum] | Similar


Similar discussions:


This thread is closed. You may not post a reply.
Chance of Islam talking over Poland ?  What is better for Poland being in the EU or being in a slavic union ?


Random: Poland and France cultures are similar

Only registered and logged-in users may post here. Please log in or register.



Home | Unanswered | Archives | Random | Statistics Time in Poland: 02:23 / Feb 10

About Us | Contact Us | Rules, Privacy | Poland Advertising

© 2005-12 PolishForums.com