Polonius3: Today's Poland is the smallest independent Poland ever, smaller by some 20% than the already truncated 2nd Republic (1918-1939), and only one-third the size of the Rzplita Objga Narod闚. This is not counting the tiny Napoleonic satellite known as the Duchy of Warsaw, which was hardly independent, nor the fluctuating statehood of early mediaeval Poland before Casimir's time. Today's compact, ethncially homogenous Poland was Dmowski's dream, whereas Pi連udski's conception was more Jagiellonian in scope. The disadvantage of being a medium-sized rather than a big country are obvious in terms of smaller economic, demographic and cultural potential as well as being internationally less reckoned with. One obvious advnatge is the lack of minority problems which plague Russia, the USA, France, Britain, Gdermany et al. And other pluses and minuses you can think of? Are you satisfied with Poland's current territorial extent?
Nothing is perfect. It would always be nice for a country to have more land, but what good is it if you have more land but ethnic populations within that extra land don't have loyalty to the country as a whole and only to their ethnic enclave?? That was the position of Poland before 1795.
Thank God Poland has a larger population today then 70 years ago and its mostly homogenous. Poland's territory maybe more compact then before but at least it doesn't have the ethnic problems of the old Yugoslavia. For now at least. As long as it strictly controls who comes into the country.
But what you say about large populaton countries is generally true. If you're a large population country, its definitely better and it helps to hedge you against neighboring countries. As long as you don't have uncontrollable enemy within ethnic populations trying to undermine you inside your own borders.
Having said that, in my opinion, Poland's future (like all European countries) is in its population growth rate. If its population dies out, it will suffer. If it increases its population, that will only open up opportunities for it.
Mexicans have opened up many opportunities to increase the size of Mexico at America's expense without firing a shot against America, by simply increasing its population and having it flood over the American border to one day seize parts of Southern United States for Mexico. The Russians have been kind of doing that with Eastern Ukraine. Russia spilled over millions of Russians into Eastern Ukraine and today there are many ethnic Russians in Ukraine and outside Ukraine who feel Eastern Ukraine is actually defacto Russian property because of that.
Speaking about territory, maybe Poles should start increasing their population to give Poland more opportunities to increase its territory the way Mexicans and Russians are trying to do so? LOL
One of the key reasons why sadly Serbia lost territory, is because the territory it lost was outnumbered 7 to 1 by non-ethnic Serbs. That was a big argument used by those who wanted to take that land from Serbia.
There will always be a direct connection between the existence of an ethnic group and the ownership of the land beneath it.
|
