PolishForums   Republic of Poland Online 
Home . Polls . Search Witamy,  [Guest 38.103.63.18]  Latest Discussions . Unanswered Posts
 Please register or login below:

 » Username  » Password 
Polish Forums / Polish Politics & History /

Poland has paid £68 Million for helping UK in WW2


  «« 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7  »»
posts: 189
 
Riff
  Jan 9, 07, 11:17  #31

Frank, Without the USA building the Russian railroads and supplying the Russians. The German casualties would have been much lower and Russia would have become German. The Russians killed would have been 5 times the ammount. Besides their freedom and their lives what money would France and Russia owe the USA?

Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Oct 23, 06

                              
 
ogorek
  Jan 9, 07, 11:57  #32

Quoting: lef, Post #24

I think you have been reading too many american war magazines and comic books.

Not really - it's just true. Of course other countires contributed to victory but the US tipped the balance both times. Nothing wrong with that - good to work in a team!!

Member
Posts: 240
Joined: Dec 16, 06

                              
 
Wayc00lio
  Jan 9, 07, 14:53  #33

Quoting: Frank, Post #25
Way...as you can see it was as below...plus another £1.2 billion from canada!

"In 1945 Britain borrowed $4.34bn from the US consisting of a $3.75bn line of credit and a "lend-lease" loan facility of $586m. The following year the government agreed a $1.185bn line of credit loan from Canada."

The USA war effort was huge, relative to the overall Western effort.....but paltry compared to the Russian........the numbers killed back that up..........80% of all German war casualties killed by the Russians.....!


Yes, we borrowed that amount in 1945 but having just paid off the last installment in Dec 06, with interest it amounted to a whopping £40 Billion. And that's POUNDS, not dollars!!!!. I misunderstood your post Frank, I was just going by the BBC news report I watched on the day the debt was finally paid off. My apologies mate - sorry about the confusion!

Member
Posts: 175
Joined: Jan 6, 07

                              
 
Frank
  Jan 9, 07, 15:09  #34

I did mention interest....but......not up to total 40 billion in the end....yet the interest rate was only 2%...aw well there goes my accountancy career....

Member
Posts: 1475
Joined: Aug 14, 06

                              
 
Wayc00lio
Edited by: Wayc00lio  Jan 9, 07, 15:43  #35

OMG - I got it totally wrong! I was out by a factor of 10! I found the link and it was 4 bn pounds! I'm sure they said it was 40 bn!!!!! You were right Frank.

Sheesh - I must pay more attention!!!!!

Member
Posts: 175
Joined: Jan 6, 07

                              
 
Frank
  Jan 9, 07, 15:44  #36

Way...its ok...its ok...honest...........!!!...I believe ya...but the rest of the world doesn't ...lol

Member
Posts: 1475
Joined: Aug 14, 06

                              
 
Wayc00lio
  Jan 9, 07, 15:48  #37

Last post edited!!!!!

Member
Posts: 175
Joined: Jan 6, 07

                              
 
Frank
  Jan 9, 07, 15:50  #38

Way....look twice...type once...good motto....

Member
Posts: 1475
Joined: Aug 14, 06

                              
 
Wayc00lio
  Jan 9, 07, 15:51  #39

Damn right there bud LOL

Member
Posts: 175
Joined: Jan 6, 07

                              
 
Amathyst
  Jan 9, 07, 15:51  #40

I took time to read a bit of Polish history tonight and it would appear that they were quite shafted after all that they did....

Member
Posts: 1933
Joined: Nov 10, 06

                              
 
Wayc00lio
  Jan 9, 07, 15:54  #41

They sure were!

Member
Posts: 175
Joined: Jan 6, 07

                              
 
Frank
  Jan 9, 07, 15:55  #42

No-one is saying the weren't.....to a degree and in the times that they were....but perhaps seek history sources from France/Poland/Germany and Russia to arrive at some understanding .......whose do you believe..........then arrive at ones own conclusion....

Member
Posts: 1475
Joined: Aug 14, 06

                              
 
ogorek
  Jan 9, 07, 18:47  #43

Frank - do you have your own conclusion?

Member
Posts: 240
Joined: Dec 16, 06

                              
 
Riff
  Jan 10, 07, 12:02  #44

I think France and Russia should pay their war debt back right now with interest. They act like they don't owe the USA anything. What about all the money to rebuild France after the war. Plus, the USA could use that money to fund it's police action in Iraq.

Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Oct 23, 06

                              
 
Riff
  Jan 10, 07, 12:26  #45

Quoting: BubbaWoo, Post #6
america charged for every bullet fired during the first gulf conflict... despite starting it themselves...

Did you ever hear of a country called Kuwait?

Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Oct 23, 06

                              
 
BubbaWoo
  Jan 10, 07, 12:29  #46

Quoting: Riff, Post #45
Did you ever hear of a country called Kuwait?


yup... your point being...?

Member
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sep 26, 06

                              
 
Babylon
  Jan 10, 07, 12:42  #47

UK paid Poland or Poland paid UK????

Member
Posts: 353
Joined: Oct 9, 06

                              
 
Amathyst
  Jan 10, 07, 13:50  #48

no one paid anyone

Member
Posts: 1933
Joined: Nov 10, 06

                              
 
ogorek
  Jan 10, 07, 15:54  #49

Quoting: BubbaWoo, Post #46

Quoting: Riff, Post #45
Did you ever hear of a country called Kuwait?


yup... your point being...?

America didn't start it.

Member
Posts: 240
Joined: Dec 16, 06

                              
 
BubbaWoo
  Jan 10, 07, 17:06  #50

you didnt actully fall for the propaganda did you ogorek...?

Member
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sep 26, 06

                              
 
Ranj
Edited by: Ranj  Jan 10, 07, 20:47  #51

Quoting: BubbaWoo, Post #50
you didnt actully fall for the propaganda did you ogorek...?

And what propaganda would that be, BW? If you are suggesting that America started the Gulf War, you need to get your facts straight! Once again, that war can be blamed on your good friend, Saddam---it started months before any coilition forces bombed Iraq.

Member
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sep 29, 06

                              
 
Matyjasz
  Jan 11, 07, 06:27  #52

Quoting: Varsovian, Post #15
The French did not fight for Polish independence, but without the slaughter fighting the Germans at places such as Verdun (in WW1, for the historically challenged) Poland wouldn't have become independent.



Partially true. Poland became independent because of the Germany failure in the WWI, the October Revolution and most of all because of hard work of Polish diplomats, that managed to convince France and it's allies that a free, strong and independent Poland is crucial for the political and military stability of European continent. Poland reemerged because it was suppose to further weaken Germany (by taking back lands that used to be polish) and to become a boundary of the western civilization and Bolshevik Russia (the biggest threat to western Europe in the 20th century), primarily to separate Russia from Germany were the idea of communist revolution was becoming more and more popular. If Russia combined it’s power with the German commies the future of Europe wouldn’t look very cheerful.

In conclusion, French soldiers never fought for Poland, as for most of the war the idea of an independent Poland was considered by the western countries as an utopia, mainly because of the position of Germany and Russia that wanted to keep the polish issue as part of their inner politics. The reemerging of my country wasn’t an act of kindness from the side of France that should be thanked for, but it was just pure business and politics. We were precious for French as long as they had some interest in it. They didn’t had any problems with sacrificing their ally Poland for their good in 1925, where they signed the Locarno Treat, that ratified only the boundaries between France, Belgium and Germany, and didn’t said anything about the eastern boundaries of Germany. It was a clear but very delicate sign in which way Germans should expand in the future, mainly in the East (Poland) and not in the West (France). Sad but true.


Quoting: Varsovian, Post #7
Wrong! Their military strategists in 1940 were as bad as Poland's were in 1939 - when the Poolish army put in a terribly poor performance. No-one, mind you, likes to tell the Poles that with the army they had they could have done 10 times better against the Germans, because it's history and you can't change it.


Terrible performance? Interesting. Look at the map from the 1939, take into the consideration how long were the frontier line with the Germans, and if you come up with a better plan of defense than the Polish government did I will salute you.

Map


Quoting: Varsovian, Post #7
Poles do love to distort things though!


Actually everybody does, not only Poles. The great thing about this forum is that we can all confront our visions of some historical events and myths.

Llooking forward to hear from you.

Member
Posts: 1462
Joined: Jul 20, 06

                              
 
iwona
  Jan 11, 07, 06:52  #53

exactly.

Noone to be really grateful.
War is usually about politics, benefits,influence, own security........

Member
Posts: 678
Joined: Aug 6, 06

                              
 
Riff
  Jan 12, 07, 12:46  #54

Quoting: BubbaWoo, Post #50
you didnt actully fall for the propaganda did you ogorek...?

Saddam was told that all he had to do was withdraw back from Kuwait and there would be no action. If Saddam would have withdrawn his troops his troops would not have been slaughtered. USA did not invade Iraq remember Bubba. The second time around Saddam was told he could leave Iraq with his billions and there would be no invasion. This time he had his people and country destroyed. He was very smart. he stayed and was hung. All this is fiction and propaganda right Bubba.

Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Oct 23, 06

                              
 
Riff
  Jan 12, 07, 13:04  #55

Quoting: Amathyst, Post #48
no one paid anyone

I second that.

Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Oct 23, 06

                              
 
Crazy Horse
  Jan 13, 07, 15:08  #56

A very big mistake was that American forces did not complete the task and destroy Sadam's Republican Guard by pushing on to Bagdad. Unfortunately politicians get to make too many decisions in war resulting in only having tofight them again at the expense of good soldiers.

As I've said before, having had some first hand experience in these things, in war there are no winners, there are no losers, there are only survivors. And that's the group you want to be in.

Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Dec 4, 06

                              
 
BubbaWoo
  Jan 13, 07, 18:31  #57

Quoting: Ranj, Post #51
And what propaganda would that be, BW? If you are suggesting that America started the Gulf War, you need to get your facts straight! Once again, that war can be blamed on your good friend, Saddam---it started months before any coilition forces bombed Iraq.


as with most americans you have a very nieive intepretation and understanding of the events that lead up to and surround both gulf conflicts... you tend to take at face value what is told to you by those charged with disseination of information to the ignorant masses... the easily lead...

if you find the strength to step away... even momentarily... from the confines that your upbring has impossed on you, and look outside of the box that most americans are holed up in, you will see a very different picture than the one that has been painted for you... a picture that isnt the picket fence apple pie of american dreams but of a very different place that the rest of the world lives in...

Quoting: Riff, Post #55
USA did not invade Iraq remember Bubba.


as you sit at home, or wherever you are, you are perfectly entitled to believe this.. but when you bring this belief to the rest of the world then you are going to encounter people who will stand up and say, no mate... you have no fekin idea what you are talking about... go home...

Member
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sep 26, 06

                              
 
Riff
  Jan 15, 07, 13:00  #58

Dear Bubbanonsense, In Desert Storm the USA did not invade Iraq. If you think they did then you are nonsense. Saudi Arabia seemed to like the fact that the USA got Saddam out of Kuwait. You must have thought that Kuwait was part of Iraq like Saddam did. Yes, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia did pay for alot of the bullets. They wanted to pay and they should have payed. 98% of the world knows this history. What one year old got you believing your propaganda. Even the Arabic media reported that Saddam took over Kuwait. I repeat, have you heard of a country named Kuwait? I conclude that you have never heard of the country named Kuwait.

Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Oct 23, 06

                              
 
Giles [Guest]
  Jan 15, 07, 13:03  #59

Riff, you need to read some Chomsky. Then it will all make sense.

Guest


                              
 
Riff
  Jan 15, 07, 13:06  #60

Quoting: BubbaWoo, Post #57
you have no fekin idea what you are talking about

Then why don't you be so kind to tell me the real history of what happened.

Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Oct 23, 06

                              
 
  «« 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7  »» Similar Threads¦Latest Discussions Go UPtop of page

Home / Polish Politics & History /


Only registered and logged-in users may post here. Please login or register.

Newer thread in this forum: Older thread in this forum:
Russian bear flexes his energy muscles - threat to Poland? Lechia & Lach - alternative names of Poland & Pole


166 users online in the last hour [Guests - 108 / Members - 58] All times are CST (GMT -6)

Home . Latest Discussions . Unanswered Posts . Statistics
© 2005-08 PolishForums.com | About Us | Contact Us | Privacy, TOS, Rules | Poland Advertising | Support PF