Quoting: blackadder
You can cherish your ancestors that came from Serbia,but you have no rights to claim land that my ancestors settled in 7 th century.yours came in 18 th century and have been given some land,after turks defeated you.
You want to convince one Vraneš in your own historic delusions?! Man, my clan was ancestral Clan of many other clans and families. Only good God know when Serbian Crow clan appeared in Dalmatia, back far in totemistic and animistic times when name of our clan was extracted from the nature (Vraneš mean of Crow, Crow`s). Then, by clan`s name location of clan was named- Vrana/Crow village, then lake Crow`s lake. Crow was animal protector of tribe and clan. Then we adopted Christianity, later Christianity split on Orthodox and Catholicism. That was like a curse to my clan. That killed and still killing whole Serbdom and Slavdom. But, from the ashes we would arise!
Listen, seams that you don`t have to offer anything to this auditorium but pure propaganda (same old ustashe school).
Serbs are old autochtonous population (speaking of Serbian lands on right side of Drina river) of Dalmatia, Lika, Kordun, Banija, Slavonia, Bosnia, Herzegovina. Old ethnic Croat regions are only Zagreb, Krizevci and Varazdin. Istria belonged to Slovenians on the first place and then partly to Serbs.
Verbal traditions of my clan and family remembered when among old Serbian population of Dalmatia/Gorski Kotari/Lika arrived Serbian refuges from Raska and Sumadija (today`s Serbia, from left side of Drina river) asking for shelter in front Turkish beasts. So, Serbs retreated among Serbs and they were welcome. Croats appeared later and were welcome, too. Nobody could predict that Croats are biggest tool of Serbian destruction in the hands of our German, Austrian and Magyar foes.
ARCHEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF SLAV CULTURES ON THE EASTERN ADRIATIC COAST IN MEDIEVAL TIMESTranslated from Serbian by Jelena Stojicevic
1st International Conference on Succesion of Adriatic Sea & on Borders Inside Former Yugoslavia, Belgrade, September 2003
rastko.org.yu/projekti/klio/sk/djankovic_e.html
Epistles of Pope George I (590-604) indicate that the Slavs lived in the vicinity of Salona in the 600s AD and that they were penetrating Italy.(1) Paul Deacon (720-797AD) noted Slav conflicts with Langobards in Northern Italy, and the Slav attack on the Langobard Benevent in 662.(2) Written sources from the 10th century contain data related to earlier centuries; these are facts from the work De administrando imperio of czar Constantine VII Porphiorgenitus (DAI)(3) and Historia Salonitana Maior of Thomas the Archdeacon.(4) These scriptures contain stories about the Slavs on the Adriatic. Serbs were allowed to inhabit Dalmatia by czar Iraklije (610-641); The Serbs were baptized then by Roman priests.
And then…
Apart from indisputably Croatian traits, which had not been recorded in Dalmatia before and which had a characteristic Franc influence, these cemeteries contain traits of previously settled Slavs, including Serbs (pottery).(14)
This layer of society was clearly differentiated in Istria, and there are no archeological cites characteristic of Croats from that period.(15)
The Serbs in the Balkans in the light of Archaeological Findings, by Djordje Jankovicrastko.org.yu/arheologija/djankovic-serbs_balkans.htm
The archaeological science has established a link, which dates back to the 7th century, between the Danube river near Brza Palanka and the region of Pljevlja.[2] This may mean that the Serbs from today's Northeast Serbia moved to the Dalmatian province of the time. This also proves that the fact about the Serbs moving from the vicinity of Salonica towards the Danube river could be true. However, there are no other data on the Serbs in the vicinity of Salonica. So, the data on the Serbs, Salonica, and Servia could be interpreted differently. Namely, the name of Salonica is similar to the name of the classical town of Solin near Split (Salona). Servia, which is around 135 km away from Salonica, bears essentially the same name as the town of Srb near Knin, located some 150 km from Solin. So, one could think that the story was about Srb and Solin, that the Serbs came first to western Dalmatia, and not to Servia and Salonica. These notions show that the problem of the accuracy of the data on the settling of the Serbs could not be solved without archaeological findings.
Relationship Towards Serbian Monuments in Konavle, by Djordje Capinrastko.org.yu/rastko-bo/istorija/djcapin-konavli_e.html
When Konavle came under the rule of Austria in 1815 began a systematic action of denationalization and uprooting of ancient Serbian customs and destroying or remodeling of Serbian monuments. The action had lasted until the fall of Austria-Hungary in 1918 and continued with more intensity during the short rule of "NDH" (independent state of Croatia) and after during the communist Socialist Republic of Croatia in the former SFR Yugoslavia. All the time until the beginning of Austro-Hungarian annexation and even later the term "Croatia" or "Croatian" is completely unknown in the region of Konavle. Not until the second half of the nineteenth century when all Roman-Catholics who spoke Serbian language were announced Croatians gradually they began to declare themselves under the pressure of authorities and Church as Croats.
Quoting: blackadder
poles,our allies who help us with... guns
Is this truth or you just trying to harm my feelings?! Official Poland actively supported creation of Greater Croatia (i know for media propaganda but this is behind that)?! Poland moved against Serbs?! I don`t believe that!
If this is truth give me strong proof and then expect my answer on this. Otherwise, just shut up!