Quoting: Lightbulb With the minor difference that no one dies. Killing millions for their race vs. inconveniencing a few hundred for "accidentally" showing up on a battlefield in Afghanistan... same thing, right? ;) Anyway, I'll agree that the president is a stubborn guy, and will never admit that the war in Iraq sort of lost its basis once no WMD were found. However, even the UN weapon inspection team's leader Hans Blix told the British media that he expected us to find weapons once we invaded Iraq. Jumping to a false conclusion is embarrasing, but if we can effect some positive change in Iraq, we might still create a net benefit and trade partner there. The Philippines was much more difficult than Iraq, and nowadays it's great over there, and probably the most pro-American country outside our borders. People who call Iraq a bad situation would probably go into fits if they looked at the Philippines c. 1900 when we fought a 10-year fight against the insurgency there, and that was without airpower, against a motivated Muslim enemy. Nothing is lost yet, contrary to what most Democrats want to believe. :)
i don't trust "official" numbers. nothing about gitmo seems legal or constitutional to me.
UNSCOM report says things to the contrary to what shrubco claimed. he didn't even let them finish thier job; which, btw, they were actually doing well.
phillipines: i think that might have been the feeling a while back but it's not so anymore.. i have many phillipino friends and that's what they tell me anyway.
we have no chance of "winning" in IRQ no matter what kind of ideas we come up with.. we messed up from the beginning and now it's really to late to fix it.
|