trener zolwia: Mere boredom is hardly a good reason to put children through divorce.
I wasn't only talking about boredom there, but whatever their reason, it's their decision. Just like it was their decision to marry.
trener zolwia: I didn't say you caused divorce. But certainly attitudes like those you hold contribute to the problem.
How? I simply don't promise someone all eternity, because I can't look into the future.
trener zolwia: You called divorce a "good thing" for crissake...
No, I didn't. I called their freedom of choice a good thing. Both husbands and wives can turn out to be abusive, and in such cases, divorce can be a good thing. Growing up in a cold, violent or abusive athmosphere can be much worse for a child than a divorce.
trener zolwia: When someone's actions negatively impact others it becomes society's problem to address.
Your actions negatively impact me. You're slandering me, twisting my words and calling me something that I'm not. You're trying to set up people against me, simply because I have a liberal stance on life. I wonder what society will do about that.
trener zolwia: See crime fighting, for one example.
Divorce is not a crime.
trener zolwia: I just feel that, particularly when children are involved, that there should be a higher hurtle for divorce.
Consider this; boredom can lead to irritation, and irritation to aggression.
trener zolwia: It shouldn't be taken so lightly. And again, boredom is hardly a good reason to put kids through that.
It's better to divorce than to raise your children in a climate of constant tension. Children will feel that.
trener zolwia: Blahblah...
The baby-boom contributed to society's resulting problems. That's why there are too many old people and not enough young people. The huge differences in salary and the inequal distribution of wealth also contributed to society's resulthing problems, because there are plenty of young men who would actually want to marry, but simply can't afford to support a family of their own.
trener zolwia: Sure I do.
Look at the above ''bla bla'' again. Like it or not, but that's the main excuse the governments use to justify the need for mass immigration, instead of trying to rehabilitate and facilitate chances for their own youths.
trener zolwia: I hate the dirty imms coming here stealing jobs.
I won't call them dirty, because to me they're just people, but I don't think we need more immigrants than we already have, no.
trener zolwia: Sure again.
Look at the ''bla bla'' again. Social and financial inequality? Like it or not, but because of underpayment and loose contracts, many young men are deemed unsuitable as partners for young women. They simply can't offer them the security and stability.
trener zolwia: Many (most?) men are jerks.
I don't think so.
trener zolwia: I can't imagine being a chick and having to sort through them all trying to find the rare gem...
I think you'll find that almost everyone's a rare gem in his or her own way if you take some time to figure them out.
trener zolwia: a mate that will take their wedding vows seriously, among other things, and not leave them when they get bored.
I'll stay for as long as she wants me to stay, but I'm not going to promise them all eternity just like that. (Maybe after ten years.)
trener zolwia: Meh. That's become little more than a Lib whining point than carrying any actual meaning these days. Anyway, what has this to do with divorce-on-demand?
Not only with divorce, but also with becoming an option to a young woman. When you have too much social inequality, which basically means the minority of men have a lot, and the majority of men doesn't have too much or even enough. Women are sensitive to that. So if there's not much security with a guy, not stability, and not much satisfaction, more relationships or marriages will fail, and more young men and women will stay single. Which means even more older people than younger people in the future.
trener zolwia: You can do what you want. (well, after you come back fr4om suspension) There was no slander in my post. I stand by my words.
I don't celebrate divorce, and I don't wish bad luck on people. I don't wish misery on anyone, or their children. The fact you're writing such things about me, makes it libel, since none of what you wrote there was the truth. (I stand by my words aswell.)
trener zolwia: You called divorce a "good thing", several times. Clearly you were celebrating one's decision to divorce.
No, I wasn't. I was talking about their freedom of choice, which is a good thing indeed, because I think that everyone should have something to say about his or her own body, life and expectations.
trener zolwia: Yes you are.
No, I'm not. I'm not political active anymore. I don't even vote anymore.
|
