celinski wrote:
Shawn_H wrote:
But, I thought American troops were still in Afghanistan...
We are still there I was refering to the last time.
Ooh,wouldnt go there realy,breifly;
Afganistan has stable govt for first time in 1960s,CIA play usual games of destabalise the neighbours of USSR. Govt of Afganistan happens to be liberal Socialist in 1970s,great gains are made in equal rights for women and education for all etc,unfortunatly Socialist sounds too close to "goddam Pinko " for the then US administration so secret arming of opposition begins by US using CIA and Deniable means. This sends Afganistan into the chaos of a civil war, Govt calls to West for help in putting down the Islamic militants, West ignores.Govt apeals to USSR for help,USSR sends in troops,atthe request of the social democratic govt of afganistan. This provides stability again and once more Afganistan becomes reletivly peacefull. Reagan appears, wants to kick the "reds" beehinds, cranks up support to islamic nutters and arranges for them to be armed with Stingers. Afganistan once more descends into chaos,USSR and Afgan Govt on one side,Future Taliban and CIA on the other,the rest,as they say,is history.....
freebird wrote:
You're the jackass who doesn't know the history. Don't even try to cover up your lack of knowledge with your cheap ass sarcasm. Whether you like it or not, you left Poles alone when they needed your help at the most. This is a well known fact you moron and trying to deny it, you make yourself look like an idiot. Besides I was born in NYC the capital of the "rednecks" you dumb ass.
That world famous American politness and oh shucks miss daisy charm does it again.......
1, You mean Donkey,
2,You left everyone alone,
3,No one denies our history,shame you dont know your own,
4,You, NYC, my arse,NYC is the home of cultured ,inteligent people not schmucks like tu.