PolishForums.com
POLAND . The Unofficial Guide
Unanswered | Archives
Poland Tips and Ideas Witamy, Guest | PF Members | Gold Members

Polish Forums / Society, Culture /

Why is circumcision not practiced in Poland?


page 8 of 15:  « Prev  1  ...  7  8  9  ...  14  15  Next » posts: 439

Peter Cracow  Dec 15, 11, 22:46    #211
What are you talking about in this thread??? To undergo an infant child this insane surgery caused by ill religious fixations (or even FASHION!) is one of the worst crime against the other human! It was a crime chased by police in Poland. Internet is full of freaks doing with their OWN cocks, asses or clits absolute horrible things, but they WANT to do it and they are mostly grown up. It's their own choice.
I understand that stoning, honour murders, cutting off nose or ears for illegal defloration and other nice procedures like male or female circumcision or so are achievements of the very progressive countries and cultures, but I had to live enough time in such a progressive system to understand what it really means for REAL people.
And one more thing. Shits about "health benefits" of circumcision were repelled by medicans 35416843975 times and I let me not to talk about it 35416843976 time.

PierdolskiThreads: -
Posts: 41
Joined: May 25, 10
Edited by: Moderator  Dec 16, 11, 01:10    #212
Rebirth:
Why is it that Poland seems like such a backwards country? It's disgusting that most Polish men are uncircumcised. Medical science has proven the health benefits of circumcision yet Poles refuse to practice it?


Who the hell would want to volunteer for amputation?

If foreskins weren't intended to be there, males would be born without them.

Maybe we should circumcize all mammal males?

Ahahahahahahahahahah!

Personal insult removed
Foreigner4Threads: 22
Posts: 1,990
Joined: Nov 18, 07
 Dec 16, 11, 12:37    #213
Pierdolski:
Maybe we should circumcize all mammal males?

y'know, i've never heard that suggestion before but it does open up an entire new avenue of debate regarding our animal nature. It's an argument that could be used against you by some but as I firmly believe we are animals in every sense of the word, i'magonnagoahead and say this is a trump hand. Well done!
hythornThreads: 6
Posts: 843
Joined: Feb 21, 08
 Dec 16, 11, 13:51    #214
the foreskin was needed when we were primitive man moseying through the undergrowth
with the advent of under crackers, the foreskin is no longer needed much like the appendix


I really do not know why I bothered to comment

utterly bored sh*tless at work at the moment
FUZZYWICKETSThreads: 12
Posts: 1,999
Joined: Nov 3, 09
Edited by: FUZZYWICKETS  Dec 16, 11, 16:22    #215
Pierdolski wrote:

Maybe we should circumcize all mammal males?

If there was a preference among the species, it would naturally change form. Don't forget, sexual selection is very influential. Just look at the male Peacock. That big goofy tail is not to help escape from predators.

Like I said before, when women start telling men "eeww, that's gross!" then that'll be the day they stop doing it. Until then, enjoy your snipped man meat.
Des EssientesThreads: 11
Posts: 2,318
Joined: Feb 6, 10
 Pictures: 4[Suspended]
 Dec 16, 11, 16:51    #216
FUZZYWICKETS:
Don't forget, sexual selection is very influential. Just look at the male Peacock. That big goofy tail is not to help escape from predators.

The species is called peafowl and the male of the species is called a peacock. Their beautiful crests do play a role in sexual selection but they do also help the bird escape from predators because they improve the bird's hearing. The peacock may be observed raising his crest to listen, in his forest home, when there are no peahens about to impress.
FUZZYWICKETSThreads: 12
Posts: 1,999
Joined: Nov 3, 09
 Dec 16, 11, 17:09    #217
It was designed for sexual selection, plain and simple. The slight hearing improvement is just a peripheral benefit.
Des EssientesThreads: 11
Posts: 2,318
Joined: Feb 6, 10
 Pictures: 4[Suspended]
 Dec 16, 11, 17:22    #218
FUZZYWICKETS:
It was designed for sexual selection, plain and simple. The slight hearing improvement is just a peripheral benefit.

No it was not "designed" it evolved through natural selection. The hearing improvement provided by a large concave surface behind one's ears is not "slight" and peafowl, for the females have crests as well, that had larger crests were better able to hear and thus avoid predators, find prey, and thereby survive to reproductive age, mate, sire progeny, and thus pass on these genes for large crests to another generation.
Dodgefan07Threads: 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Apr 14, 12
Edited by: Dodgefan07  Apr 14, 12, 01:34    #219
Rebirth
Why is it that Poland seems like such a backwards country? It's disgusting that most Polish men are uncircumcised. Medical science has proven the health benefits of circumcision yet Poles refuse to practice it?

You seem to have a question and a statement. It depends on what country you are comparing Poland to, in order to say it is backwards, and it may be more backwards in some areas, and yet more advanced or progressive in others.
This really is a separate issue from the circumcision thing.
In many ways Poland is advanced -- they have the second oldest constitution in the world, after USA.
POland's literacy rate is 99 % -- higher than that of the USA.
Polish mathematicians cracked the enigma code that directly led to the defeat of Hitler and the Nazi regime and the Allied victory in WWII. :-)

On the other hand, they are backwards in some areas -- but this is directly due to communism, not the Polish people. Communism destroyed creative thinking and brainstorming, and created a culture of distrust and suspicion.

As for circumcision, this is directly due to the Catholicism and the long, dark history of anti-semitism. They say Peter was the first pope, and Peter was circumcised, as well Paul, and Jesus, and all the apostles -- whom they call saints. Catholicism banned circumcision, but to show the hypocrisy, they didn't ban ear piercing, or tongue piercing, or eyebrow piercing.
Countries where circumcision is routinely practiced also have the lowest rates of cervical cancer per capita in the world -- Israel, USA, and South Korea. It is much cleaner, and the MAYO clinic states that uncircumcised boys have ten times more urinary tract infections than circumcised boys do.
At least 85 % of American guys are circumcised, and the majority of those who are not are foreign.
Cervical cancer rates are lowest in the world, in countries like South Korea, Israel, and USA, where circumcision is routinely practiced -- plus we don't have issues with phimosis and not nearly as many Urinary tract infections.
Foreigner4Threads: 22
Posts: 1,990
Joined: Nov 18, 07
 Apr 14, 12, 12:05    #220
I guess Polish men simply don't care or are completely unattracted to American women as it seems it's American women who mostly seem to be calling for this. Now why aren't Polish men interested in American women? There's probably not enough room on the internet for that:)
peterwegThreads: 35
Posts: 1,997
Joined: Feb 16, 07
 Apr 14, 12, 14:05    #221
Who cares what the US thinks about it, circumcision isn't practice in many other western countries, its a barbaric practice dating back to pre-history.
donlou31Threads: 1
Posts: 38
Joined: Mar 30, 10
 Apr 14, 12, 14:56    #222
Some Pole, back in the day, had the sense to ignore this barbaric act of mutilation, and quite rightly so.
It should have been banned a long time ago but people continue to damage their own sons. If simply being born isn't already traumatic enough to a little guy, his parents whip him off within 7 days to have his foreskin yanked off.

Dodgefan07-
MAYO clinic states that uncircumcised boys have ten times more urinary tract infections than circumcised boys do.

I couldn't find that info but I did find this below from the same site (mayoclinic.com)

Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. The overall risk of urinary tract infections in males is low, but these infections might be more common in uncircumcised males. Severe infections early in life can lead to kidney problems later on.



Kinda conflicting.

I can't believe that I just read some mother who said she got her sons done as she didn't want them to be different with their friends....Oh my god! it's not a new pair of Nikes she was buying, it's a body part she got rid of. I personally don't give a toss what their friends thought. Maybe that mother would allow her kids to get a 3rd eye implanted in the middle of the forehead, just to "fit in" because the other kids done it.
I watched a documentary years ago about adult men all at different ages, who had been cut when they were babies. All of them had some kind of problems like erectile dysfunction and desensitisation. A couple of them were even trying to grow/stretch the skin back (with little weights and belts, if I remember correctly) It was sad to watch them and I have to say seeing them on the TV was my first time viewing a cut man.....I can't say that I liked the look of it very much, it looks a bit dazzled with nowhere to hide :) I prefer my sausage with skin on.
noreenbThreads: 4
Posts: 1,082
Joined: Apr 22, 09
 Pictures: 3
 Apr 14, 12, 15:26    #223
Because it hurts.
pipThreads: 11
Posts: 1,293
Joined: Jul 4, 11
 Apr 14, 12, 16:32    #224
that mutilation is not necessary- there are no proven health risks. It is garbage.
ChlebThreads: 1
Posts: 40
Joined: Feb 29, 12
 Apr 14, 12, 16:44    #225
Seems quite pointless.

Rebirth:

Why is it that Poland seems like such a backwards country? It's disgusting that most Polish men are uncircumcised. Medical science has proven the health benefits of circumcision yet Poles refuse to practice it?


Backwards?

Would you rather risk having foreskin or chop it off?
pipThreads: 11
Posts: 1,293
Joined: Jul 4, 11
 Apr 14, 12, 18:31    #226
there is no need for circum. In fact, in Canada it is not standard practice but done on request. There truly is no need for it. Just because some things have been done in our history- doesn't make them right.

All men are able to clean themselves properly- if there is an infection, typically it is because of poor hygene.
jon357Threads: -
Posts: 622
Joined: Mar 15, 12
 Pictures: 1
Edited by: jon357  Apr 14, 12, 18:57    #227
donlou31:
Some Pole, back in the day, had the sense to ignore this barbaric act of mutilation, and quite rightly so.
It should have been banned a long time ago but people continue to damage their own sons. If simply being born isn't already traumatic enough to a little guy, his parents whip him off within 7 days to have his foreskin yanked off.

It's never been standard practice in Europe, except within the Jewish community.

There's no health benefit whatsoever. Only drawbacks (if you'll excuse the pun). One is that the foreskin is attached to the glans until the kid is a certain age, and circumcision causes permanent damage - the result is a loss of sensation in the one part of the body where there's meant to be lots.
urszulaThreads: 2
Posts: 362
Joined: Aug 31, 07
 Apr 14, 12, 22:01    #228
It's barbaric like in a horror movie, a tradition brought in by the jews. A baby feels this mutilation. Mothers who allow this to be done to their children are either stupid, insensitive or don't love thier child. Besides, it looks ugly.
Des EssientesThreads: 11
Posts: 2,318
Joined: Feb 6, 10
 Pictures: 4[Suspended]
 Apr 14, 12, 22:13    #229
urszula:
It's barbaric like in a horror movie, a tradition brought in by the jews.

It was even used as a military tactic by them:
14 They said to them, “We can’t do such a thing; we can’t give our sister to a man who is not circumcised. That would be a disgrace to us. 15 We will enter into an agreement with you on one condition only: that you become like us by circumcising all your males. 16 Then we will give you our daughters and take your daughters for ourselves. We’ll settle among you and become one people with you. 17 But if you will not agree to be circumcised, we’ll take our sister and go.”

18 Their proposal seemed good to Hamor and his son Shechem. 19 The young man, who was the most honored of all his father’s family, lost no time in doing what they said, because he was delighted with Jacob’s daughter. 20 So Hamor and his son Shechem went to the gate of their city to speak to the men of their city. 21 “These men are friendly toward us,” they said. “Let them live in our land and trade in it; the land has plenty of room for them. We can marry their daughters and they can marry ours. 22 But the men will agree to live with us as one people only on the condition that our males be circumcised, as they themselves are. 23 Won’t their livestock, their property and all their other animals become ours? So let us agree to their terms, and they will settle among us.”

24 All the men who went out of the city gate agreed with Hamor and his son Shechem, and every male in the city was circumcised.

25 Three days later, while all of them were still in pain, two of Jacob’s sons, Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brothers, took their swords and attacked the unsuspecting city, killing every male.

Genesis 34.
natasiaThreads: 3
Posts: 246
Joined: Jun 21, 08
 Apr 15, 12, 01:00    #230
Rebirth:
It's disgusting that most Polish men are uncircumcised.


Is this some sort of a joke?

As a normal female, intact as I was when I came out of the womb, I would (as would most of the world) be horrified at the idea that anyone should 'rearrange' my genitals.

So why, please tell me why, should it be ok to chop off someone's foreskin?

The foreskin is there for several good reasons. It has a job to do, as does everything Nature provided. And given that reproduction is our primary drive, and the male organ the primary deliverer of this function ... do you honestly think Nature would have got it wrong??????

Bollocks (excuse the oblique pun) to all this nonsense about 'cleanliness' and 'disease'. I am obviously not a guy, but I understand that if one practises basic, simple hygiene procedures in the shower, it is more than possible to keep your dick clean. ! Suffice to say I have intimate knowledge of an uncircumcised male who is perhaps the cleanest person on the planet. The phrase 'you could eat your dinner of it' comes to mind.

It is a monstrous idea, cutting off the foreskin. OK, if someone has a problem, it is too tight, it hurts them ... ok. That is medical. But as a matter of culture and principle? Maybe, eons ago, when tribes lived in water-less regions, but even then ... sorry. I think it is barbaric. The mechanism of the foreskin is a thing of wonder to behold. Why oh why would anyone even think of messing with that?????
Dodgefan07Threads: 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Apr 14, 12
 Apr 16, 12, 01:12    #231
urszula:
It's barbaric like in a horror movie, a tradition brought in by the jews. A baby feels this mutilation. Mothers who allow this to be done to their children are either stupid, insensitive or don't love thier child. Besides, it looks ugly.


Hello Ursula, Interesting perspective, You should actually read more medical statistics before you post, and your racist comments make your whole point even weaker.
First of all, most places use local anesthesia, and the majority of countries today where circumcision is practiced are non-Jewish countries and also non-muslim. ;-)

Circumcision has been practiced for thousands of years by people in Egypt before Islam ever existed, by some North American Indian tribes and by many tribes in Africa.

"Mother's who allow this to be done to their children are either stupid, insensitive, or don't love their child." LOL. So what about Mary, the mother of Jesus?? Which one was it for her??
And what about Peter's mother, and all the other apostles the Catholic church claim as saints??
I don't know if your village has access to high speed internet or not, or if you can do a Google search?
The MAYO Clinic is one of the most widely-known and respected clinics in the world, and It is located in the USA. They cite multiple medical benefits of circumcision, including lower rates of cervical cancer for women in countries where circumcision is routinely practiced, and significantly lower rates of HIV among men who are circumcised.

I don't expect you have heard of the Journal of American Medical Association, or the CDC Center for Disease Control, just to name a few.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm

http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/306/13/1479.full.
You have the right to believe that an circumcised penis is ugly -- and anything else you want, but your charge that mothers and fathers who allow this are stupid, or don't love their child, is baseless, and makes you sound like a Wiesniak. It is because they choose to look at the medical benefits and because we love our children, and we care about the future wives of the boys, that we do this.

There is a reason that the lowest rates of cervical cancer in the world are the same countries where circumcision is routinely practiced, and it is not because we don't eat kaszanka.
jon357Threads: -
Posts: 622
Joined: Mar 15, 12
 Pictures: 1
 Apr 16, 12, 01:29    #232
Dodgefan07:
So what about Mary, the mother of Jesus?? Which one was it for her?? ...And what about Peter's mother, and all the other apostles the Catholic church claim as saints??

That doesn't actually mean they were good people or had any medical knowledge. We know almost nothing about them, nor did the people who declared them 'saints'..
Dodgefan07:
I don't know if your village has access to high speed internet or not, or if you can do a Google search?

You might be surprised to know that much of Poland has probably got better internet speeds than wherever you live.
Dodgefan07:
They cite multiple medical benefits of circumcision, including lower rates of cervical cancer for women in countries where circumcision is routinely practiced, and significantly lower rates of HIV among men who are circumcised.

Circumcision is not a protection against HIV and the cervical cancer statistic is spurious.
Dodgefan07:
the medical benefits

There are none.
Dodgefan07:
it is not because we don't eat kaszanka.

???
Dodgefan07Threads: 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Apr 14, 12
 Apr 16, 12, 01:32    #233
pip:
that mutilation is not necessary- there are no proven health risks. It is garbage.


Dzien Dobry, Pip, You have strong opinions about it, we can see, but don't let the mountains of medical research, scores of case studies in multiple countries involving thousands of men, and things like facts stand in your way.

I respect your right to believe shaking hands in the doorway brings bad luck, or that circumcision is mutilation, or any other fairy tales you want.

You have to remember,when millions of people in Europe died from the Black plagues and it bypassed all the Jewish communities, many Poles and other people blamed the Jews. They were following the practice given to them by God.
The facts are that the majority of countries where circumcision is routinely practiced are non-Jewish, and have the lowest rates of cervical cancer in the world. South Korea, USA, Phillipines, and Israel has the lowest rate of cervical cancer of any country.

The CDC, Center for Disease Control, and the Journal of American Medical Association, and WebMD, and the MAYO clinic cite multiple health benefits of circumcision.
All the men the Catholic church claims as Early Saints were circumcised.

It sounds better to just say you don't believe all the medical research from around the world, than to say that there are no proven health risks, PIP. wink.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/306/13/1479.full
http://www.dawanet.com/nonmuslim/intro/misc/circum1.html -- This site alone, by a Doctor, lists more than 40 separate sources, case studies involving thousands of men in multiple countries.
jon357Threads: -
Posts: 622
Joined: Mar 15, 12
 Pictures: 1
Edited by: jon357  Apr 16, 12, 01:39    #234
Dodgefan07:
You have to remember,when millions of people in Europe died from the Black plagues and it bypassed all the Jewish communities, many Poles and other people blamed the Jews. They were following the practice given to them by God.

Are you seriously suggesting that circumcision is a prophylactic against Bubonic Plague?
Dodgefan07:
All the men the Catholic church claims as Early Saints were circumcised.

Which is no reason we should be. They also wore sandals. Maybe that's why they didn't get plague.
http://www.dawanet.com/nonmuslim/intro/misc/circum1.html -- This site alone, by a Doctor, lists more than 40 separate sources, case studies involving thousands of men in multiple countries.
You do realise that this is a religious site? Try this:
www.intactamerica.org/resources/decision
or this:
http://www.butterflybirth.com/10-reasons-not-to-circumcise/
or this:
http://www.alternet.org/health/135757
Dodgefan07Threads: 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Apr 14, 12
 Apr 16, 12, 01:48    #235
Hello Peter,
First of all, I'm not Jewish -- I'm Scots-Irish-American. Religious fixations??? Circumcision is routinely practiced, in the USA, Philippines, South Korea, and many countries in Africa, which are mostly Christian -- or at least, not Jewish.

At least it is honest for you to say that you reject all the mountains of medical and scientific evidence for the benefits of circumcision.
You have to remember, Peter, when millions of people died in Europe in the Black plagues, and it bypassed the Jewish communities, many Poles and other nations blamed the Jews. They were following practices given to them by God.

When you attach anti-Semitic Catholic tradition to your post, it makes your whole post weak, Peter.

Maybe you have heard of the MAYO Clinic?? It is one of the most widely-respected, and highly-advanced clinics in the world, and they cite multiple health benefits of circumcision.

http://www.dawanet.com/nonmuslim/intro/misc/circum1.html -- this one site alone, and article by a doctor cites 62 separate sources, medical doctors, and multiple case studies involving thousands of men, in multiple countries -- not Jewish.

http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/306/13/1479.full

There is a reason, Peter, that the lowest rates of Cervical cancer in the world, are in the same countries where circumcision is routinely practiced -- South Korea, USA, Israel, and Philippines, and it's not because we don't eat Kaszanka, Peter. :-)
Gruffi_GummiThreads: 1
Posts: 167
Joined: Jul 2, 11
Edited by: Gruffi_Gummi  Apr 16, 12, 02:30    #236
Dodgefan07:
At least it is honest for you to say that you reject all the mountains of medical and scientific evidence for the benefits of circumcision.


All this evidence becomes irrelevant once you note that you can simply wash these body parts, instead of mutilating them. The benefits of washing are comparable to the benefits of mutilating, without the side effects. You know, some warm water, soap...

Speaking of hygiene - google the NIH grant 3U01MH066701-07S1. :)
urszulaThreads: 2
Posts: 362
Joined: Aug 31, 07
Edited by: urszula  Apr 16, 12, 03:15    #237
Dodgefan07:
Circumcision is routinely practiced, in the USA,

It isn't. You have a choice, nobody is forcing you to do this to your child. Some people don't know any better and put their kid under the knife. Women prefer unaultered males anyway.
It's interesting how guys who were mutilated defend themselves. Lol.
Dodgefan07:
and they cite multiple health benefits of circumcision.

Why do they do this to innocent children then? Do it when you grow up and can make your own decission.
pipThreads: 11
Posts: 1,293
Joined: Jul 4, 11
 Apr 16, 12, 08:03    #238
the thing about your sources is that those hospitals and "respectable doctors" will say whatever the company who is footing the bill and sponsoring- wants them to say.

How about Canada? It is now only done on request so more people are opting not to have it done. Those that are still doing it- do it for religious reasons. It is not necessary.
Foreigner4Threads: 22
Posts: 1,990
Joined: Nov 18, 07
 Apr 16, 12, 09:29    #239
Dodgefan07:
LOL. So what about Mary, the mother of Jesus?? Which one was it for her??

LOL is right, you know nothing factual about if those people existed or in what capacity they did. You'd have been better off without this in your post.
Dodgefan07:
There is a reason, Peter, that the lowest rates of Cervical cancer in the world, are in the same countries where circumcision is routinely practiced

The reasons could very well be circumsision but the reasons may also be correlated to standards of living. If you really want to get analytical then take the number of cases of cock cancer in those countries and compare which ones are of circumcized men vs non circumcized and then compare those rates to the rates of circumcision and THEN you'll have something to talk about.

What about animals, do they get circumsized? Do they get the cock cancer? We are animals after all, maybe it's not our bodies but it's how we live that is the problem...
peterwegThreads: 35
Posts: 1,997
Joined: Feb 16, 07
 Apr 16, 12, 10:47    #240
Dodgefan07:
First of all, I'm not Jewish -- I'm Scots-Irish-American. Religious fixations??? Circumcision is routinely practiced, in the USA, Philippines, South Korea, and many countries in Africa, which are mostly Christian -- or at least, not Jewish.


Yup, its basically a third world practice. HIV and witchcraft are also common in Africa.


page 8 of 15:  « Prev  1  ...  7  8  9  ...  14  15  Next »

Home / Society, Culture / Unanswered [this forum] | Similar


Similar discussions:

Is Polish Trance music the best in the world?  Why Polish Diminutives/Nicknames are so popular?


Random: FRIDGE needed - WARSAW area

Only registered and logged-in users may post here. Please log in or register.


41 [Guests - 33 / Members - 8] users on live forums now


Home | Unanswered | Archives | Random | Statistics Time in Poland: 01:49 / May 27

About Us | Contact Us | Rules, Privacy | Poland Advertising

© 2005-12 PolishForums.com