Krakowianka: Are you serious? You can't be comparing the 30 year old LOT planes to Ferarris! I compare them more to the PKS. Dirty seats, service with a little attitude and broken seats. Except the PKS is a short ride and sitting in the broken seat shouldnt be sooo bad. But if I pay over $1000 for a ticket, I expect at least the chair to function, and if its supposed to play music to entertain me, than make sure it works. I suppose your right about that.. I shouldn't be comparing a plane to a car anyway. If you sat in that pilot seat it wouldn't be that bad... :) [quote=Krakowianka] I can see your passion for flying :) But as much as I love to travel, I dont love to sit on LOT for 9-10 hours :).[
Ya I agree, didn't like to sit in that chair for that long either.. I flew a Cessna 172 as a pilot straight for 5 hours on a hot summer day with my window open and my arm out the window, it was great, I could have flow for another 5 hours and I wasan't tired at all. My brother was in the back seat for the first hour and was so freaked out from me practicing those takeoffs and landings he was ready to throw up, so I had to land and the get him out, then continued to fly for another 4 hours. ....So I see your point being a passenger... lol
The old stories are past from generation to generation that LOT is simply a bad airline and that's what the company's reputation is now on. I believe they should just change the name LOT to something else and just say they've have new managment, once they get these new 8's in. Anyway that's how they do it in the states. BTW love the new cockpit in the 787 just fabulous...
|