Monia: Why did he show old people , rather poor , some looking like homeless or parts of the city with rubbish on the soil , partially without pavement ? Because like any city in the world, another photo collection of all the historical and touristy place are ten a dozen. For example some of the more interesting places in Glasgow are the poorer districts, they speak volumes from where the city has come from.
Monia: This is not Warsaw its just his vision That's the point is it not?
Monia: entirely distorted That's your opinion.
Monia: Why didn`t he show Warsaw in a more normal way , not taking sides , showing young , smiling people instead of old and grim. Because he wasn't taking the pics to put them into a tourist book. He was taking the pics to show the other side of Warsaw.
Monia: We don`t dine out there ! But some still do.
Monia: I could go to London and make the same photo session of poor suburbs and show to Polish readers how London looks like . Would it be fair ? No, because he is not trying to portray Warsaw as a poor city. He is just showing some parts that maybe don't get a mention in most books. Praga being case and point, how many people actually know about that part of the city. Same as Krakow, not many people knew about Nowa Huta in the past but now it's becoming more and more famous with tourists.
|