Matthiuszka my pudding brained foe, enough of the Russia rhetoric, it's a non issue on why this is poor investment of physcial, financial and energy resources. Your pathetic laments on the Russian Bear is matched only by your masturbatory predisposition towards all things american and military. You're sick and you ought to seek help.
matthias wrote:
poland is already a target for allying with U.S.. anyways
so you support making it worse? if anything that's a bloody clear reason for a clear headed leader to cut ties.
matthias wrote:
Actually EU wants the shield now that they see it will be part of the NATO structure
source please and thank you.
But this still alienates Poland as the buffer zone target which has a clear American presence. It does have the potential to make Poland the new obvious target, which current member states will be too happy to have but also use this to snub it whenever possible. See the F16 deal that took place about 4 years ago or so, case in point.
Now if you can honestly state that you're always in full 100% support of EU and NATO initiatives then you'd have a hellu arguement and naivety to boot.
matthias wrote:
second poland agrees to host it, when poland was joining the EU this too infringed Polands sovereignty...but the benefits outweight the costs.. once again another weak argument...
au contraire my simple minded foe, the benefits of EU membership have not come to fruition and the costs have yet to be borne, so to use your own statement (funny how you can't even grasp what you type)-
matthias wrote:
so you don't know
matthias wrote:
Poland is not paying for it....
entirely not the point. But it is very probably that the Poles in Poland (not you pretenders) will pay for it in terms of security.
I'll add though, that if Poland gained complete autonomy over this thing then while not being an advocate of military buildup it would be much better than an American presence in Poland.
As stated before, I've yet to see an interventionist (even a disguised one) that hasn't come with alterior motives by the intervening state. If you really believe that American policy makers just woke up one day and thought "ahhh heck les go'n make sure them Poles get some missles to stop Timbuktoo from shootin at'em" then you are a bigger fool than you've led us all to believe.
celinski wrote:
We must never forget Polands past and loss of freedom.
and Poland is giving it up like matthiuszka did to the starting QB on prom night, only Polish leaders may well stand to play the part of the biggest suckers in Europe-sad.
Patrycja19 wrote:
not every thing is based on logic.
Not the kind of logic that one could argue or readily quantify BUT putting forth a logical argument based on pros and cons is surely one of those things. If you are incapable of discerning childcare from a political argument ,I emplore you, spend less time with your children as that is certainly in their best interests.
Patrycja19 wrote:
but feelings and or opinions arent included in that logic.. because human feelings
change frequently so logic doesnt fit the picture..
I don't really give a damn for internet feelings, while i won't out and call you a waste of a carbon footprint, similarily, there's no reason to consider another's feelings if this is a topical and not personal debate.
However, I am fascinated....please tell me more how opinions aren't included in that logic i've been referring to, i am truly looking forward to any explanation you can muster for that one!
Patrycja19 wrote:
its going to provide more jobs ( military of course)
and poland will benefit with the money coming in to run it..
You write more military jobs like it's a good thing.
But it appears even the pro missle crowd isn't quite sure what they suppport, mattiuszka seems to think it hasn't been decided if in fact it will be american run or Polish. Yet if money comes in to run it then that pretty much tells us who has control over their newest military outpost.
Patrycja19 wrote:
if the select few other countries
werent so agressive we wouldnt be even thinking about it..
who the bloody hell is "we?" you mean u.s. leaders or polish ones? your loyalties have to lie somewhere when push comes to shove. Besides that Patycakes, your nonpoint brings the best reason not to invest the time, money or energy into this stupid thing-there's no f'n threat, none, zero, zilch, but if you build it, they will come.
Patrycja19 wrote:
example.. a baby crying.. What logic would you use to stop if from crying? its feeling
something,, but logically you cant find the answer.. because it could possibly be so
many things that you have to do to find the one answer.. and the next time the baby
cries.. it will be something totally different.. same with people.. logic doesnt fit
so why you use this as your defense system is beyond me.
So it is beyond you as to why I have, to this point, treated your noise as anything more than a baby crying? Message received, your whole arguement is based on nothing more than irrational, reactionary, infantile whims.
Hey matthiuszka, i like your cheering section!
Foreigner4 the Win!