PolishAmericanReview's review of current events in America

Here is an interesting review of current events in America by a Polish American website named PolishAmericanReview.com

polishamericanreview.com/par_014.htm

I find it quite interesting.

So you find comments like this 'quite interesting'?



(comment : the fact that they lost in court suggests that NBC actually didn't do such a thing)



Can't even get their facts right - as I recall, Poland never surrendered.

..

It has to be said - this website does a far better job of insulting Polish-Americans than anyone on PF ever did.

Doubtless since the writing style, including the inappropriate use of capitalisation, is identical to his.

A court found OJ Simpson innocent so I guess he's innocent. LOL


So according to you the Poles are still fighting WWII against the Nazis and Soviets? I didn't know that.


I highly doubt that. You have done a pretty good job just by yourself insulting Poles on the PF forum.

This website defends Polish people and also has many positive stories and youtube videos on Poles, which appears to insult your sensibilities.

In my opinion, you should be one of the last people judging what's good for Poles, since you feel anti-Polish hate joke websites are fine.

Found innocent by his peers. Who are you to argue?


What part of Poland never surrendered do you need explained?

Anyone with an even basic grasp of 20th Century Polish history knows that.


The website doesn't do anything to defend Polish people, in fact, it does a great job of portraying Polish people as being backwards village racists. Any website that goes on about "Liberals" and promoting "White Supremacy" is, by nature, trash.


Do I?

MediaWatch: So according to you the Poles are still fighting WWII against the Nazis and Soviets? I didn't know that.


Well I agree the Poles in their hearts never surrendered.....but different parts of Poland stopped fighting at different times against Nazi and Soviet forces.

If you feel Poles never surrendered or stopped fighting then maybe you should tell that to all the history web sites like this one.
history.com/this-day-in-history/poland-surrenders

I know Poles are fighters but I never realized the Poles never stopped fighting WWII against the Nazis and Soviets and are still fighting today. That's a new one on me

;-)[/quote]
MediaWatch: This website defends Polish people and also has many positive stories and youtube videos on Poles, which appears to insult your sensibilities.


So its a thought crime to talk about Liberals? Where are they promoting "White Supremacy"?

MediaWatch: In my opinion, you should be one of the last people judging what's good for Poles, since you feel anti-Polish hate joke websites are fine.


Yes you do. That's why you posted them before and took pleasure in them. Do you have to be so coy?

Yes, very much so.


Just nutty stuff from America. Mediawatch's own tinfoil helmet site.

There was never a formal surrender by the Polish. It's basic, basic Polish history - Poland kept fighting until the very end and even beyond. Nice to see that you think that Poland was cowardly and just surrendered within weeks.


Oh dear. Is that what you learn in school?

The website itself makes it clear that while Warsaw might have surrendered, the Polish did not. Do you need to learn about what the Armia Krajowa was?


It's your website, you know where they are just fine.


Proof?


It's so nutty that MediaWatch can't even get basic Polish facts right.

Nothing new of course, he takes great pride in humiliating Poles.

MediaWatch: Well I agree the Poles in their hearts never surrendered.....but different parts of Poland stopped fighting at different times against Nazi and Soviet forces.


Like where? The website says first off "Poland Surrenders".

history.com/this-day-in-history/poland-surrenders

Did you not read that?

So according to you the Poles are still fighting WWII? I didn't know that. When do you think they will stop fighting? LOL

When was "the very end"? That's when you said Poles fought until. Then you said they fought until "even beyond". Which is it? The very end or beyond? And what were those points in time??

Stop if with your fake sympathy for Poland. You know you hate Poland. All you have ever done is attack and find fault with Poland and Polish people for all the years you have been on the Polishforums website.

MediaWatch: So its a thought crime to talk about Liberals? Where are they promoting "White Supremacy"?


Its my website? Like I designed and wrote all that stuff on that PolishAmericanReview.com website? Oh why thank you very much for that complement for thinking I can do all that! LOL But no that wasn't me. But I do like that website. If a Poland-Basher like you and the other Poland-Bashers don't like it, then it must be a fine website LOL

There is NO White Supremacy on that website. You won't give examples of it because you are lying as usual. You would only like that website if it attacked and slandered Polish people. Just admit it.


Yeah right. You're the one (and john357) with all the tinfoil anti-Polish conspriacy theories and the one who loves to humiliate Polish people. All you have ever done is bash Polish people in the years you have been here. If Jews criticize Poles here....you take the side of the Jews. If there is an issue between Poland and your favorite nation Russia....you take the side of the Russians. All you ever do here is try your hardest to find fault with Poles while professing your fake sympathy for Poland.

Oh dear. MediaWatch, please, stop embarrassing yourself.

Let's start :


Straight from your link. Poland didn't surrender, only Warsaw - and if you knew anything about WW2 Poland, you'd know that the plan was always to retreat to a strategic area. The surrender of Warsaw didn't mean the surrender of Poland, and if it did, what was the "cursed soldiers" all about?


As far as Poland is concerned, the war only really finished when the last President of the Government-in-Exile, Ryszard Kaczorowski handed over the symbols of his office to Lech Walesa. Successive actions since have reaffirmed that position that Poland was still not at peace until 1992 - as mentioned below.


I suggest reading about the "cursed soldiers" and the Government in Exile. Again, basic history for anyone interested in Poland.

Anyway, the end point was 16th January 1992. That was when the "Treaty of Good Neighbourship and Friendly Cooperation" was ratified.

pl.wikisource.org/wiki/Traktat_mi%C4%99dzy_Rzecz%C4%85pospolit%C4%85_Polsk%C4%85_a_Republik%C4%85_Federaln%C4%85_Niemiec_o_dobrym_s%C4%85siedztwie_i_przyjaznej_wsp%C3%B3%C5%82pracy_z_17.06.1991_r


Strangely, I think it's you that has the problem with Poland. You seem determined to portray Poles as being backwards village dwellers - while even insisting that they surrendered very quickly and ignoring the existence of the resistance movements.


We know you wrote it, because it features exactly the same writing patterns as you have. The random capitalisation is but one giveaway.


Edited it, have you?

I wonder when you're going to apologise to Poland for insisting that she surrendered.

The title on that page is wrong.


The conflict between Poland and Germany ran from 1 September 1939 (when Germany invaded Poland) until 8 May 1945: on that day the German Instrument of Surrender was signed and officially ended the conflict.

The conflict between Poland and the USSR ran from 17 September 1939 (when the USSR invaded Poland) until 30 July 1941: on that day the Sikorski–Mayski agreement was signed and officially ended the conflict.

It is shameful that people who claim to be in the slightest bit Polish know so little about Polish history.

I don't think in Polish eyes that either of those treaties count - but either way, it shows how utterly ignorant MediaWatch is if he thinks that the Poles surrendered after 5 weeks.

Strange how the same nonsense is found on his website, isn't it?

The one from 30 July 1941 certainly counts: it was signed by the Polish prime minister!


Now there is a shocker: North American who claims to be Polish is utterly ignorant of basic facts about Poland! Never seen that before, have we.

That's a question - was it ratified under the rules of the Government-in-Exile?

As far as I understand it, Poland seems to regard the Government-in-Exile's decisions as not being binding?


Definitely shocker!

Why does it matter anyhow? The Polish forces got crushed by the invading German and Soviet forces, and after a few weeks everything was over. Resistance movements existed in almost all occupied countries, even though their armies surrendered to the Germans.

Well, speaking purely from the common Polish point of view - one source of pride among most of them is that Poland never formally surrendered. It's what lent legitimacy to the Armia Krajowa and subsequent resistance movements. I think in the minds of the Polish, while the territory was lost, sovereignty wasn't - hence why the Government-in-Exile continued in London just as the Free French did.

MediaWatch is being amazingly ignorant of Polish history if he believes that Poland surrendered.

It was indeed ratified under the rules of the G-i-E.

As far as I understand the actions of the G-i-E are recognised as legitimate by Poland if taken before the TRJN was set up.

I'm sure you weren't following those events blow by blow back then. Alll it proved was that the big bucks were on the TV network's side to bankroll pricey big-time lawyers as well as various forms of behind-the-scenes pressure.

Only the very naive believe rich and poor receive equal treatment in courts anywhere. Unless one happanes to belong to a PC-supported showcase minority. Can a court-appointed lawyer compete with a heavily bankrolled pricey top-shelf attorney?

Expensive lawyers do tend to get results - that's why they're expensive.


Could you name some?

Any website that promotes lefty-liberals and their PC fairy tales is by definition pure rubbish!

Could you perhaps explain which websites promote which "showcase minorities"?

Do expand on this.

Surely someone who believes in pregnant virgins would like fairy tales.

Blacks, Jews, homosexuals, feminists, the operators of abortion mills, animals....

I have just informed our cat that he is part of a showcase minority with its own dedicated websites and expensive lawyers to defend its rights. He was very impressed.

You learn something new every day. Yes, there are loads of organisations with an animal rights agendas, not to mention the ecologists defending the habitat of frogs and rodents. They've got their own websites, are often bankrolled by wealthy donors, defended by pricey lawyers and promoted by professional PR specialists. And there's nothing wrong with that, except denying it exists. Here are but two websites; the rest you'll have to find on your own.

greatnonprofits.org/categories/view/animals?gclid=CIPzrdz-zrgCFQYd3godEHgANg

abolitionistapproach.com

That sounds strangely like the Lux Veritas foundation - bankrolled by dubious anonymous donors, backed up by expensive lawyers and promoted by expensive specialists.

Hijacking a thread again? The Lux Foundation is deifntiely not one of the PC dictatorship's pet minorities, glamourised, promoted and handled with kid gloves. Why not then start a thread on the PC dictatoirship's bêtes noires, bugbears, hate-speech targets and other assorted pet villains. That would be a first on PF and would come from a partisan source that knows what he's talking about.

That doesn't really make sense.

Do you have something against the people listed above? And why animals?

You forgot to mention second-hand women, and people who like popmusic.

sobieski
Those were but a few examples. Others include domestic violence but only by males against women. The PC folks have to tread lightly round this topic since the most domestic violence occurs in same-sex households, and those are the darlings of the PC dictatorship. Intetrested in exploring that topic? Go to it and do your Google homework or forever hold your peace.