Its not my website so I can't edit it but thanks again for the complement that you think I wrote and designed that whole website.
Designed is the wrong word, although the writing is certainly similar to yours.
You are the one being ignorant in arguing semantics here.
It is not semantics. What part of
Poland did not surrender are you struggling with?
they are referring to the main Polish battle forces on Polish territory that still had any chance in making any tangible results in taking back any part of Polish territory from the overwhelming German and Russian forces that invaded and infested Poland after Sept 1, 1939.
What are you talking about? There were plenty of Polish forces that made their way to the West, and have you forgotten the major Polish successes during the war? It was a
world war - Poland did not surrender.
But that's not what we are talking about here. We are talking about the main Polish army forces on Polish soil fighting who had any chance of winning back Polish territory and not underground or gorilla Polish fighters.
You claimed Poland surrendered. She did not. Individual forces are irrelevant - what matters is that Poland never surrendered.
This is from a Pro-Polish website on the demise of Poland's main battle forces after German and Russian forces infested Poland:
Do they say that Poland surrendered? No? There's your answer.
Sheesh, for someone who claims to be "pro-Poland", you seem hell bent on showing that Poland lost in WW2.